Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1367

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law UNDER RULE 50(b) THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT ARE NOT INVALID, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59 by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
§
INCORPORATED and THE REGENTS
§
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA §
§
Plaintiffs,
§
§
vs.
§
§
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., AMAZON.COM §
INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP §
INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.,
§
GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY
§
CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC.,
§
YAHOO! INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC.,
§
§
Defendants.
§

CASE NO. 6:09-CV-00446-LED

JURY TRIAL

ORDER
Before the Court is the Renewed Motion of Plaintiffs the Regents of the University of
California and Eolas Technologies Incorporated for Judgment as a Matter of Law Under Rule
50(b) That the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in-Suite Are Not Invalid, Or in the Alternative for
a New Trial Under Rule 59. Having considered the motion, the Court is of the opinion that it
should be GRANTED.
Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Renewed Motion of Plaintiffs the Regents of
the University of California and Eolas Technologies Incorporated for Judgment as a Matter of
Law Under Rule 50(b) That the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in-Suit Are Not Invalid is
GRANTED. The Court hereby issues its JUDGMENT that the asserted claims of the patents-insuit are not invalid, including claims 1 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,838,906, and claims 1, 3, 10,
16, 18, 20, 22, 36, 38, 40, and 42 of U.S. Patent No. 7,599,985.

McKool 438375v1