Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1368

Opposed MOTION to Amend/Correct 1354 Judgment by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

EXHIBIT 2

Case: 4:05-cv-00788-CDP Doc. #: 367

Filed: 07/09/07 Page: 1 of 1 PageID #: 7614

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
EASTERN DIVISION
LEGGETT & PLATT,
INCORPORATED, and L&P
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
COMPANY,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
VUTEK, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 4:05CV788 CDP

JUDGMENT
For reasons stated in my Memoranda and Orders issued today and earlier,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that
defendant VUTEk shall have judgment on plaintiffs’ complaint and on its
counterclaim for invalidity. Plaintiffs’ complaint is dismissed in its entirety, and
VUTEk’s counterclaim for non-infringement is dismissed as moot. Claims 1, 2, 3,
7, 9, 10, and 19 of U.S. Patent 6,755,518 are invalid. VUTEk shall recover taxable
costs in the amount of $144,817.16 from plaintiffs.

_______________________________
CATHERINE D. PERRY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 9th day of July, 2007.