Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
1383
RESPONSE in Opposition re 1368 Opposed MOTION to Amend/Correct 1354 Judgment Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Correct Judgment Pursuant to Rules 59(e) and 60(a) filed by Amazon.com Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Reines, Edward)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED and
THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., AMAZON.COM
INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP
INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.,
GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY
CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC.,
YAHOO! INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC.,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 6:09-CV-446
Defendants.
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CORRECT JUDGMENT
PURSUANT TO RULES 59(e) AND 60(a)
The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Correct Judgment pursuant to Rules
59(e) and 60(a) and Defendants’ opposition thereto, finds that the Motion should be GRANTED
IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Accordingly, the Court will enter the proposed Amended
Final Judgment submitted with Defendants’ opposition as Attachment A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?