Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1383

RESPONSE in Opposition re 1368 Opposed MOTION to Amend/Correct 1354 Judgment Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Correct Judgment Pursuant to Rules 59(e) and 60(a) filed by Amazon.com Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Reines, Edward)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs, vs. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., AMAZON.COM INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC., GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC., YAHOO! INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC., § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:09-CV-446 Defendants. ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CORRECT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULES 59(e) AND 60(a) The Court, having considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Correct Judgment pursuant to Rules 59(e) and 60(a) and Defendants’ opposition thereto, finds that the Motion should be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Accordingly, the Court will enter the proposed Amended Final Judgment submitted with Defendants’ opposition as Attachment A.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?