Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1389

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct Post-Trial Deadline For Submission of Defendants' Bill of Costs by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446 (LED) JOINT AGREED MOTION TO AMEND POST-TRIAL DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF DEFENDANTS’ BILL OF COSTS Plaintiffs Eolas Technologies, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California, and Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Google, Inc., J.C. Penney Corp., Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube LLC (collectively the “Defendants”) respectfully move to amend the post-trial deadline for submission of Defendants’ Bill of Costs, as prescribed by FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d)(2)(B)(i) and Local Rule CV-54(a) from April 6, 2012, to April 13, 2012. The parties have exchanged various drafts of proposed recoverable costs and have conducted several meet and confers as required by Local Rule CV-54(b). As a result of the meet and confer process the Defendants have agreed to revise some of the proposed costs and to further consider some of the positions taken by Plaintiffs. The parties believe that they should be able to narrow the issues to be determined by the Court if provided additional time to meet and confer and after additional review of each side’s proposal. Thus, and in light of the intervening Easter Holiday, the parties request additional time for preparation and collaboration of the joint Bill of Costs. JOINT AGREED MOTION TO AMEND POST-TRIAL DEADLINE – Page 1 This motion is not made for delay and should not impact any other deadline applicable to this case. For these reasons, Plaintiffs and Defendants jointly request that the Court extend the deadline for submission of Defendants’ Bill of Costs from April 6, 2012, to April 13, 2012. JOINT AGREED MOTION TO AMEND POST-TRIAL DEADLINE – Page 2 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mike McKool Mike McKool Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 13732100 mmckool@mckoolsmith.com Douglas Cawley Texas State Bar No. 04035500 dcawley@mckoolsmith.com McKool Smith, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 Kevin L. Burgess Texas State Bar No. 24006927 kburgess@mckoolsmith.com John B. Campbell Texas State Bar No. 24036314 jcampbell@mckoolsmith.com Josh W. Budwin Texas State Bar No. 24050347 jbudwin@mckoolsmith.com Gretchen K. Curran Texas State Bar No. 24055979 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com Matthew B. Rappaport Texas State Bar No. 24070472 mrappaport@mckoolsmith.com McKool Smith, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 s/ Joshua R. Thane (w/ permission) Jennifer H. Doan Texas Bar No. 08809050 Joshua R. Thane Texas Bar No. 24060713 Shawn A. Latchford Texas Bar No. 24066603 Haltom & Doan Crown Executive Center, Suite 100 6500 Summerhill Road Texarkana, TX 75503 Telephone: (903) 255-1000 Facsimile: (903) 255-0800 Email: jdoan@haltomdoan.com Email: jthane@haltomdoan.com Email: slatchford@haltomdoan.com Jared Bobrow Edward R. Reines Sonal N. Mehta Aaron Y. Huang Andrew L. Perito WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Email: jared.bobrow@weil.com Email: edward.reines@weil.com Email: sonal.mehta@weil.com Email: aaron.huang@weil.com Email: andrew.perito@weil.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS AMAZON.COM, INC. AND YAHOO! INC. ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND THE /s/ Brandon Stroy (w/ permission) REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF James R. Batchelder (pro hac vice) CALIFORNIA james.batchelder@ropesgray.com Sasha G. Rao (pro hac vice) sasha.rao@ropesgray.com Mark D. Rowland mark.rowland@ropesgray.com JOINT AGREED MOTION TO AMEND POST-TRIAL DEADLINE – Page 3 Brandon Stroy (pro hac vice) brandon.stroy@ropesgray.com Lauren N Robinson (pro hac vice) lauren.robinson@ropesgray.com Rebecca R. Hermes (pro hac vice) rebecca.hermes@ropesgray.com Han Xu (pro hac vice) han.xu@ropesgray.com ROPES & GRAY LLP 1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor East Palo Alto, California 94303-2284 Telephone: (650) 617-4000 Facsimile: (650) 617-4090 Michael E. Jones (Bar No. 10929400) mikejones@potterminton.com Allen F. Gardner (Bar No. 24043679) allengardner@potterminton.com POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College, Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75702 Telephone: (903) 597-8311 Facsimile: (903) 593-0846 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC s/ Christopher M. Joe (w/ permission) Jeffrey K. Joyner (pro hac vice) joynerj@gtlaw.com Jeffrey F. Yee (pro hac vice) yeej@gtlaw.com GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400E Santa Monica, CA 90404 Telephone: (310) 586-7700 Facsimile: (310) 586-7800 JOINT AGREED MOTION TO AMEND POST-TRIAL DEADLINE – Page 4 Christopher M. Joe (Bar No. 00787770) chrisjoe@bjciplaw.com Brian Carpenter (Bar No. 03840600) brian.carpenterb@bjciplaw.com Eric W. Buether (Bar No. 03316880) eric.buethere@bjciplaw.com BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC 1700 Pacific, Suite 2390 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 466-1270 Facsimile: (214) 635-1842 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a), on this the 4th day of April 2012. /s/ Josh Budwin Josh Budwin CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Counsel for Plaintiffs and Defendants held a meet and confer on April 3 and 4, 2012 regarding the aforementioned motion, and the requested relief is agreed by all parties. /s/ Josh Budwin Josh Budwin JOINT AGREED MOTION TO AMEND POST-TRIAL DEADLINE – Page 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?