Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1397

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 1367 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law UNDER RULE 50(b) THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT ARE NOT INVALID, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law UNDER RULE 50(b) THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT ARE NOT INVALID, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59 filed by Amazon.com Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Reines, Edward)

EXHIBIT B

JDX 184\LANL_CD\LANL_CD\SOFTWARE\MEDVIEW\MEDVIEW.AP (ln 1906)

JDX 184\LANL_CD\LANL_CD\SOFTWARE\MEDVIEW\MEDVIEW.AP (ln 1913)

JDX 184\LANL_CD\LANL_CD\SOFTWARE\MEDVIEW\MEDVIEW.AP (ln 2082)

**************

1

JDX 184\LANL_CD\LANL_CD\SOFTWARE\MEDVIEW\MEDVIEW.AP (lns 5744-5746)

JDX 184\LANL_CD\LANL_CD\SOFTWARE\MEDVIEW\MEDVIEW.AP (lns 5106-5113)

2

JDX 184\LANL_CD\LANL_CD\SOFTWARE\MEDVIEW\MEDVIEW.AP (lns 5457-5460)

JDX 184\LANL_CD\LANL_CD\SOFTWARE\MEDVIEW\MEDVIEW.AP (ln 6130)

************

3