Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 1400

Unopposed MOTION FOR HEARING ON RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW UNDER RULE 50(b) THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT ARE NOT INVALID, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59 re 1367 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law UNDER RULE 50(b) THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT ARE NOT INVALID, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law UNDER RULE 50(b) THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT ARE NOT INVALID, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59 by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, The Regents of the University of California. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
§
INCORPORATED and THE REGENTS
§
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA §
§
Plaintiffs,
§
§
vs.
§
§
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., AMAZON.COM §
INC., CDW CORPORATION, CITIGROUP §
INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.,
§
GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY
§
CORPORATION, INC., STAPLES, INC.,
§
YAHOO! INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC.,
§
§
Defendants.
§

CASE NO. 6:09-CV-00446-LED

JURY TRIAL

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR HEARING ON RENEWED
MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
AND EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER
OF LAW UNDER RULE 50(b) THAT THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF THE PATENTSIN-SUIT ARE NOT INVALID, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL
UNDER RULE 59
After considering Plaintiffs’ Request for Hearing on Renewed Motion of Plaintiffs for
Judgment as a Matter or Law Under Rule 50(b) That the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in-Suit
Are Not Invalid, or in the Alternative for a New Trial Under Rule 59, the Court hereby GRANTS
the request.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Renewed Motion of Plaintiffs for Judgment as a Matter
or Law Under Rule 50(b) That the Asserted Claims of the Patents-in-Suit Are Not Invalid, or in
the Alternative for a New Trial Under Rule 59 is set for hearing on __________________, 2012.

McKool 442471v1