Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 208

Joint MOTION to Dismiss WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(2) by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Argosy Publishing, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 208 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, § § Plaintiff, § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § vs. § § Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., § JURY TRIAL Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., § Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., § Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., § The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., § J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan § Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., § Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., § Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., § Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun § Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., § Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC § § Defendants. § JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(2) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated ("Eolas") and Defendant Argosy Publishing, Inc. ("Argosy") (Eolas and Argosy are referenced individually as "Party" and collectively as "the Parties"), hereby jointly move to dismiss any and all claims made by Eolas against Argosy in the above-captioned action and any and all counterclaims made by Argosy against Eolas in the above-captioned action, without prejudice to re-filing the same. Eolas and Argosy further stipulate that all fees, costs and expenses relating to the abovecaptioned litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees) shall be borne solely by the Party incurring the same. Austin 55805v3 Dockets.Justia.com The Parties respectfully request that the Court grant their Motion and dismiss without prejudice their respective claims against each other. This dismissal shall have no bearing on Eolas' claims with respect to the other defendants in the above-captioned action. 2 Austin 55805v3 DATED: January 28, 2010 Respectfully submitted, MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. /s/ Mike McKool Mike McKool Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 13732100 mmckool@mckoolsmith.com Douglas Cawley Texas State Bar No. 04035500 dcawley@mckoolsmith.com Luke McLeroy Texas State Bar No. 24041455 lmcleroy@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 Sam F. Baxter Texas State Bar No. 01938000 sbaxter@mckoolsmith.com McKool Smith, P.C. 104 E. Houston St., Ste. 300 P.O. Box O Marshall, Texas 75670 Telephone: (903) 923-9000 Telecopier: (903) 923-9095 Kevin L. Burgess Texas State Bar No. 24006927 kburgess@mckoolsmith.com Steven J. Pollinger Texas State Bar No. 24011919 spollinger@mckoolsmith.com Josh W. Budwin Texas State Bar No. 24050347 jbudwin@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 3 Austin 55805v3 /s/ N. Claire Abernathy (with permission) N. Claire Abernathy State Bar No. 24053063 claire@dhenryfirm.com David P. Henry State Bar No. 24027015 dhenry@dhenryfirm.com THE HENRY FIRM, P.C. P.O. Box 3104 Longview, Texas 75606 Telephone: (903) 230-9874 Facsimile: (903) 230-9875 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, ARGOSY PUBLISHING, INC. 4 Austin 55805v3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic services on this the 28th day of January, 2010. Local Rule CV5(a)(3)(A). /s/ Kevin Burgess Kevin Burgess 5 Austin 55805v3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?