Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 241

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 214 MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, § § Plaintiff, § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 § § vs. § § Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., § JURY TRIAL Apple Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., § Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., § The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., § J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan § Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., § Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., § Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., § Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun § Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments § Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC § § Defendants. § JOINT AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AGREED DOCKET CONTROL AND AGREED DISCOVERY ORDER The Court, having considered the parties' Joint Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Agreed Docket Control and Agreed Discovery Order, and finding good cause supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the parties' Joint Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Agreed Docket Control and Agreed Discovery Order is hereby GRANTED, and that the parties have until March 22, 2010, to file their agreed docket control order and agreed discovery order. No other deadline applicable to this litigation is affected by this Order. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16th day of March, 2010.

Austin 57650v1

__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE