Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 313

Unopposed MOTION to Seal Moving Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cederoth, Richard)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., ET AL, DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., BLOCKBUSTER INC., EBAY INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC., GOOGLE INC., NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC., ORACLE AMERICA INC. (FKA SUN MICROSYSTEMS, INC.), PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC., YAHOO! INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEAL THEIR REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) The Court, having considered Defendants Adobe Systems, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Blockbuster Inc., eBay Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., New Frontier Media, Inc., Oracle America Inc., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC's ("Moving Defendants") Unopposed Motion to Seal Their Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Transfer to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1404(a) ("Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Transfer"), finds that good cause having been shown, Moving Defendants' Motion to Seal Their Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Transfer should be granted. The Moving Defendants may file their Reply Brief in Support of the Motion to Transfer under seal.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?