Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 350

RESPONSE in Opposition re 346 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 214 MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 214 MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 214 MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 214 MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 214 MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 214 MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) MOTION to Change Venue to the U.S. District Court for the filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Cederoth, Richard)

Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Doc. 350 Att. 1

Exhibit A

Dockets.Justia.com

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:

Josh Budwin Donahey, Teague Eolas Defendants; Eolas RE: Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al., No. 6:09-cv-446 (E.D. Tex.) Wednesday, June 30, 2010 9:03:49 AM

Teague Given that we already meet and conferred on this, and that we already filed our Motion for Extension of Time, we see no reason to change the posture now. Thanks.

From: Donahey, Teague [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 6:44 PM To: Josh Budwin Cc: [e-mail]; Eolas Subject: Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Adobe Systems, Inc., et al., No. 6:09-cv-446 (E.D. Tex.)

Josh: We spoke today regarding Eolas's motion for an extension of time to file a surreply with respect to the transfer motion. I asked whether, if the moving defendants agreed to drop any opposition to this motion for an extension, Eolas would agree not to argue that transfer should be denied because the proceedings in this action are too far along and the Court's investment and familiarity with the case weigh against transfer. You stated that you needed to see the request in writing before providing a firm response. Please let me have Eolas's position. Thank you. Teague

________________________________________ Teague I. Donahey Sidley Austin LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Direct Line: (415) 772 -7431 Fax: (415) 772 -7400 www.sidley.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. **************************************************************************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.
****************************************************************************************************