Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 422

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Certain Discovery by Office Depot, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Heartfield, J)

Download PDF
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 422 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple ) Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., ) CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito) Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google ) Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan ) Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office ) Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy ) Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, ) Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., ) Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and ) YouTube, LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 6:09-cv-446 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED The Honorable Leonard Davis United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF OFFICE DEPOT, INC. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE CERTAIN DISCOVERY The Court, having considered the Unopposed Motion of Office Depot, Inc. for Extension of Time to Complete Certain Discovery from September 29, 2010 (Dkt. 381) until October 13, 2010 for the rolling document production, and finding good cause, including Office Depot s commitment that it will continue to produce documents to Plaintiff on a rolling basis, supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Office Depot, Inc. to complete its rolling document production pursuant to Paragraph 2(b) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order (Dkt. 247) is extended until October 13, 2010. Office Depot, Inc. is hereby ordered to continue producing documents on a rolling basis as quickly as reasonably possible. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?