Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 45

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, Or Otherwise Respond To Plaintiff's Complaint For Patent Infringement by Blockbuster Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wooten, David)

Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Doc. 45 Att. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.; AMAZON.COM, INC.; APPLE INC.; BLOCKBUSTER INC.; CDW CORP.; CITIGROUP INC.; eBAY, INC.; FRITO-LAY, INC.; THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.; GOOGLE INC.; J.C. PENNY COMPANY, INC.; JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.; OFFICE DEPOT, INC.; PEROT SYSTEM CORP.; BLOCKBUSTER ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.; RENT-A-CENTER, INC.; STAPLES, INC.; SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.; TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.; YAHOO! INC.; and YOUTUBE, LLC Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT BLOCKBUSTER INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendant Blockbuster Inc. filed it Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint through December 17, 2009. The Court is of the opinion that such motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Blockbuster Inc. shall have through December 17, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § §

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-cv-446 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Dockets.Justia.com