Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 470

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fedock, John)

Download PDF
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 470 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penny Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § C.A. NO. 6:09-CV-446 (LED) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE CERTAIN DISCOVERY The Court, having considered the Unopposed Motion of Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. for Extension of Time to Complete Certain Discovery from October 20, 2010 (Dkt. 443) until October 29, 2010 for the rolling document production, and finding good cause, including Playboy's commitment that it will continue to produce documents to Plaintiff on a rolling basis, supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline for Defendant Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. to complete its rolling document production pursuant to Paragraph 2(b) of the Joint Agreed Discovery Order (Dkt. 247) is extended until October 29, 2010. Playboy is hereby ordered to continue producing documents on a rolling basis as quickly as reasonably possible. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?