Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 5

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, by Google Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al Doc. 5 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED § § v. § § ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.; § AMAZON.COM, INC.; APPLE INC.; § ARGOSY PUBLISHING, INC.; § BLOCKBUSTER INC.; CDW CORP.; § CITIGROUP INC.; eBAY, INC.; § FRITO-LAY, INC.; § THE GO DADDY GROUP, INC.; § GOOGLE INC.; J.C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC.; § JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.; § NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.; § OFFICE DEPO, INC.; PEROT SYSTEMS CORP.; § PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES § INTERNATIONAL, INC.; § RENT-A-CENTER, INC.; STAPLES, INC.; § SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.; § TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC.; § YAHOO! INC.; and YOUTUBE, LLC § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 Jury Trial Demanded ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE, LLC'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendants Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC filed its Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint through December 17, 2009. The Court is of the opinion that such motion should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC shall have through December 17, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement. {A07\NEW\NEW\W0406779.1 } Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?