Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 648

Unopposed MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS P.R. 3-1 INFRINGMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO AMAZON CLOUD PLAYER by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-cv-446 JURY TRIAL EOLAS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS P.R. 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO AMAZON CLOUD PLAYER 1 Austin 67056v1 I. INTRODUCTION Eolas moves the Court for leave to supplement its P.R. 3-1 infringement contentions with respect to Amazon and its newly released Amazon Cloud Player as discussed herein. Amazon does not oppose this request. This request does not extend to any other defendants in this action. The parties agree to work together to adjust the discovery period if needed. II. EOLAS’ UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR RELIEF 1. Eolas served its P.R. 3-1 infringement contentions against Amazon on March 5, 2. Since March 5, 2010, Amazon added new functionality to its accused products: 2010. namely the Amazon Cloud Player included in the infringement contentions attached as Exhibit A hereto. Prior to filing this Motion, Eolas provided a copy of the infringement contentions for Amazon’s newly released Amazon Cloud Player to counsel for Amazon. Counsel for Amazon has indicated that it does not oppose Eolas’ request for leave to supplement its infringement contentions for the ’906 and ’985 patents for Amazon Cloud Player. Eolas will re-serve such contentions on Amazon’s counsel within three days of the date the Court grants this motion. 2 Austin 67056v1 Dated: May 6, 2011. MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. /s/ Mike McKool Mike McKool Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 13732100 mmckool@mckoolsmith.com Douglas Cawley Texas State Bar No. 04035500 dcawley@mckoolsmith.com J.R. Johnson Texas State Bar No. 24070000 jjohnson@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 Kevin L. Burgess Texas State Bar No. 24006927 kburgess@mckoolsmith.com John B. Campbell Texas State Bar No. 24036314 spollinger@mckoolsmith.com Josh W. Budwin Texas State Bar No. 24050347 jbudwin@mckoolsmith.com Matthew B. Rappaport Texas State Bar No. 24070472 mrappaport@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Austin 67056v1 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Counsel for Eolas has conferred with counsel for Amazon regarding the relief requested in this Motion. Defendant is unopposed to the relief requested in this Motion. /s/ Josh Budwin Josh Budwin CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A) on May 6, 2011. /s/ Josh Budwin Josh Budwin Austin 67056v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?