Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 69

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Sun Microsystems, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement by Sun Microsystems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION § § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § § Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., § Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., § Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., § Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., § The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., § J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan § Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., § Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., § Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., § Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun § Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., § Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC, § § Defendants. § Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Case No. 6:09-cv-446-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER On this day came on to be considered Sun Microsystems, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Move, Answer, or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement, and the Court being of the opinion that the same should be GRANTED, it is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Motion to Extend Time be granted and that Sun Microsystems, Inc. be given to and including December 17, 2009 to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?