Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 766

Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 759 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
Adobe Systems Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; Apple )
)
Inc.; CDW Corp.; Citigroup Inc.; eBay Inc.;
)
Frito-Lay, Inc.; The Go Daddy Group, Inc.;
)
Google Inc.; J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.;
Office Depot, Inc.; Staples, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; )
)
and YouTube, LLC,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Adobe Systems Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; Apple )
Inc.; CDW LLC; eBay Inc.; Frito-Lay, Inc.; The )
Go Daddy Group, Inc.; Google Inc.; J.C. Penney)
Corporation, Inc.; Office Depot, Inc.; Staples, )
Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and YouTube, LLC,
)
)
Counterclaimants,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
)
)
Counterdefendant.
)
)
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,

No. 6:09-cv-00446-LED (filed Oct. 6, 2009)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
EXTENSION OF DEADLINES FOR EXPERT REPORTS
The Court having considered the parties’ Joint Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines
for Expert Reports, and finding good cause supporting it, finds the Motion should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following deadlines are now in place, replacing
deadlines for the same previously issued by the Court in Docket Nos. 670, 694 and 759:

Event
Parties with burden of proof
designate expert witnesses on
non-damages issues.
Eolas designates expert
witness(es) on damages issues.
Parties designate rebuttal
expert witnesses on nondamages issues.
Defendants designate rebuttal
expert witness(es) on damages
issues.

Existing Deadline

New Deadline
Requested by this Motion

July 18, 2011
[Docket No. 759]

Monday, July 18, 2011

July 18, 2011
[Docket No. 759]

Monday, July 25, 2011

July 29, 2011
[Docket No. 759]

Monday, Aug. 15, 2011

July 29, 2011
[Docket No. 759]

Monday, August 22, 2011

Additionally, the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to supplement their
expert reports within a reasonable time after the Court issues a claim construction order, to the
extent necessitated by that order, and/or for good cause in light of discovery received subsequent
to the deadline for the applicable expert report.
Additionally, the parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to depose expert
witnesses within a reasonable time about their expert reports, notwithstanding the close of
discovery on August 12, 2011.
No other deadlines are affected by this Order.

2