Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
767
Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 247 Order by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED JOINT MOTION TO PROCEED WITH
JOINTLY SCHEDULED DEPOSITIONS
The Court, having considered the parties’ Unopposed Joint Motion to Proceed with
Jointly Scheduled Depositions, and finding good cause supporting it, finds the Motion should be
granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Eolas may proceed with any depositions that Eolas
and the defendants jointly agree to schedule, notwithstanding the collective 350 hour deposition
limitation in the discovery order. The time incurred in these depositions shall count against
Eolas’ deposition time limits whether those limits are increased by agreement of the parties or by
Court order if there is no agreement.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Michael Doyle shall appear for deposition by
Defendants in his individual capacity and/or with respect to 30(b)(6) topics 5–13 for up to 14
hours in Chicago at the offices of one of Defendants’ counsel on Thursday, August 11, and
Friday, August 12, 2011, or at such other date and location as the parties may otherwise agree.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?