Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
776
Joint MOTION to Stay by Apple Inc., Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
JOINT MOTION TO STAY
Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated and Defendant Apple Inc. (the "Parties")
hereby jointly and respectfully request that all activities (discovery, expert reports, etc.) as to
Apple Inc. be stayed for two weeks. The Parties have reached a tentative agreement to resolve
the case, subject to the drafting and execution of written documentation acceptable to both
Parties. The Parties respectfully request this stay and extension of all pre-trial deadlines so that
the Parties may focus on finalizing resolution of the case. The Parties agree that this Motion
does not effect the date of trial, jury selection or the pretrial conference.
1
Dallas 325541v1
Date: July 20, 2011
By: /s/ Richard A. Cederoth
David T. Pritikin (pro hac vice)
Richard A. Cederoth (pro hac vice)
Shubham Mukherjee (pro hac vice)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: (312) 853-7000
Facsimile: (312) 853-7036
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Mike McKool
Mike McKool
Lead Attorney
Texas State Bar No. 13732100
mmckool@mckoolsmith.com
Douglas Cawley
Texas State Bar No. 04035500
dcawley@mckoolsmith.com
Holly Engelmann
Texas State Bar No. 24040865
hengelmann@mckoolsmith.com
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: (214) 978-4000
Telecopier: (214) 978-4044
Teague I. Donahey (pro hac vice)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 772-1200
Facsimile: (415) 772-7400
Josh W. Budwin
Texas State Bar No. 24050347
jbudwin@mckoolsmith.com
Gretchen K. Curran
Texas State Bar No. 24055979
gcurran@mckoolsmith.com
Matthew B. Rappaport
Texas State Bar No. 24070472
mrappaport@mckoolsmith.com
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: (512) 692-8700
Telecopier: (512) 692-8744
Sandra S. Fujiyama (pro hac vice)
Theodore W. Chandler (pro hac vice)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
Bryan K. Anderson (pro hac vice)
Aaron R. Bleharski (pro hac vice)
Duy D. Nguyen (pro hac vice)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road, Building 1
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: (650) 565-7000
Facsimile: (650) 565-7100
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
2
Dallas 325541v1
Eric M. Albritton (Bar No. 00790215)
ALBRITTON LAW FIRM
P.O. Box 2649
Longview, TX 75606
Telephone: (903) 757-8449
Facsimile: (903) 758-7397
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AND
COUNTERCLAIMANT APPLE INC.
3
Dallas 325541v1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who
have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A) on this July 20, 2011.
/s/ John Campbell
John Campbell
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I hereby certify that counsel for Eolas Technologies Incorporated conferred with counsel
for Apple Inc., regarding the foregoing motion, who represented that Apple Inc. joins in this
motion.
Dated: July 20, 2011
/s/ John Campbell
John Campbell
4
Dallas 325541v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?