Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
785
Joint MOTION to Amend/Correct 768 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Adobe Systems Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; Apple )
Inc.; CDW Corp.; Citigroup Inc.; eBay Inc.;
)
Frito-Lay, Inc.; The Go Daddy Group, Inc.;
)
Google Inc.; J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.;
)
Office Depot, Inc.; Staples, Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; )
and YouTube, LLC,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Adobe Systems Inc.; Amazon.com, Inc.; Apple )
Inc.; CDW LLC; eBay Inc.; Frito-Lay, Inc.; The )
Go Daddy Group, Inc.; Google Inc.; J.C. Penney)
Corporation, Inc.; Office Depot, Inc.; Staples, )
Inc.; Yahoo! Inc.; and YouTube, LLC,
)
)
Counterclaimants,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
)
)
Counterdefendant.
)
)
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
No. 6:09-cv-00446-LED (filed Oct. 6, 2009)
JOINT UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR EXPERT REPORTS
ON DAMAGES ISSUES AS BETWEEN EOLAS AND EBAY
This Motion is made jointly and is unopposed. On July 13, 2011, the Court entered the
parties’ agreement on expert report deadlines [Docket No. 768]. Subsequently, Eolas and eBay
discussed modifying the deadlines for expert reports exchanged between Eolas and eBay on
damages issues. The parties propose modifying the deadlines for expert reports exchanged
between Eolas and eBay on damages issues as set forth below:
Austin 68663v1
Event
Parties with burden of proof
designate expert witnesses on
damages issues.
Parties designate rebuttal
expert witnesses on damages
issues.
Existing Deadline
July 25, 2011
[Docket No. 768]
August 22, 2011
[Docket No. 768]
New Deadline
Requested by this Motion
Friday, July 29, 2011
(Eolas’ submission to eBay
only)
Friday, August 26, 2011
(eBay’s submission to Eolas
only)
This motion is not made for delay, and should not impact any other deadline applicable to
this litigation, including the trial setting. Specifically, this motion does not seek to modify the
dates for any parties’ submission of expert reports on damages issues other than between Eolas
and eBay. Accordingly, the parties respectfully move the Court for an Order setting the deadlines
provided above.
Austin 68663v1
DATED: July 22, 2011
By: /s/ Mike McKool
Mike McKool (Bar No. 13732100)
Douglas Cawley (Bar No. 04035500)
Rosemary T. Snider (Bar No. 18796500)
J.R. Johnson (Bar No. 24070000)
jjohnson@mckoolsmith.com
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: (214) 978-4000
Facsimile: (214) 978-4044
Sam F. Baxter (Bar No. 01938000)
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
104 E. Houston St., Ste. 300
P.O. Box O
Marshall, TX 75670
Telephone: (903) 923-9000
Facsimile: (903) 923-9099
Kevin L. Burgess (Bar No. 24006927)
John B. Campbell (Bar No. 24036314)
Josh W. Budwin (Bar No. 24050347)
Matt Rappaport (Bar No. 24070472)
mrappaport@mckoolsmith.com
Lindsay K. Martin (Bar No. 24049544
lmartin@mckoolsmith.com
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700
Austin, TX 78701
Telephone: (512) 692-8700
Facsimile: (512) 692-8744
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterdefendant Eolas Technologies, Inc.
Austin 68663v1
By: /s/ Edward Reines______
Edward Reines
Sonal N. Mehta
Andrew L. Perito
Andrew.perito@weil.com>
M. Scott Fuller (Bar No. 24036607)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
Jennifer H. Doan
jdoan@haltomdoan.com
Joshua R. Thane
jthane@haltomdoan.com
HALTOM & DOAN
6500 Summerhill Road, Suite 100
Texarkana, TX 75503
Telephone: (903) 255-1000
Facsimile: (903) 255-0800
Attorneys for Defendants and
Counterclaimants eBay Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local
Rule CV-5(a)(3) on July 22, 2011.
/s/ J.R. Johnson
Austin 68663v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?