Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 817

Unopposed MOTION to Expedite EOLAS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON EOLAS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS P.R. 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO GOOGLE MUSIC AND GOOGLE+ by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § EOLAS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING ON EOLAS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT ITS P.R. 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS WITH RESPECT TO GOOGLE MUSIC AND GOOGLE+ On August 2, 2011, Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated (“Eolas”) filed its Motion for Leave to Supplement Its P.R. 3-1 Infringement Contentions With Respect to Google Music and Google+. (Dkt. No. 815). Eolas requests that the Court issue an expedited briefing schedule on this motion and address the motion on an expedited basis. Because the issues are straight-forward, the issues have been addressed before in similar motions and they have been pending as to Google Music and Google+ for some time, and because the parties will benefit from knowing the result of Eolas’ motion to supplement its infringement contentions, Eolas requests that the Court set an expedited briefing schedule for Eolas’ Motion to Supplement Its P.R. 3-1 Infringement Contentions, as set forth below: Defendants’ opposition brief due: Wednesday, August 10, 2011. Eolas’ reply brief due: Monday, August 15, 2011. WHEREFORE, Eolas therefore requests the Court grant the expedited briefing schedule as outlined above and in the attached Order. DATED: August 3, 2011 Respectfully submitted, McKOOL SMITH P.C. By: /s/ Mike McKool Mike McKool Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 13732100 mmckool@mckoolsmith.com Douglas Cawley Texas State Bar No. 04035500 dcawley@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 Kevin L. Burgess Texas State Bar No. 24006927 kburgess@mckoolsmith.com John B. Campbell Texas State Bar No. 24036314 jcampbell@mckoolsmith.com Josh W. Budwin Texas State Bar No. 24050347 jbudwin@mckoolsmith.com Gretchen K. Curran Texas State Bar No. 24055979 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com Matthew B. Rappaport Texas State Bar No. 24070472 mrappaport@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Counsel for Plaintiff conferred with Counsel for Defendant regarding the relief requested in this motion on August 2, 2011. Counsel for Defendant stated that they do not oppose the relief sought in this motion. /s/ Christopher Mierzejewski Christopher Mierzejewski CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that counsel of record are being served with a copy of this document via electronic mail on this day, August 3, 2011. /s/ Christopher Mierzejewski Christopher Mierzejewski

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?