Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 818

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 790 SEALED MOTION Defendant Go Daddy's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Based On Its License Defense by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.

§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

EOLAS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO GO
DADDY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated (“Eolas”) files this Unopposed Motion for
Extension of Time for Eolas to Respond to Go Daddy’s Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement and would show the Court the following:
I.
The Go Daddy Group, Inc. (“Go Daddy”) filed its Motion for Summary Judgment of
Non-Infringement on July 25, 2011 (Dkt. No. 790).

Pursuant to the Local Rules, Eolas’

Opposition Brief is due August 11, 2011.
II.
Eolas and Go Daddy (hereinafter “the parties”) have further discussed extending the
deadline for Eolas’ Opposition Brief. Therefore, Eolas respectfully requests an extension of time

to file its Opposition Brief to Go Daddy’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement
until August 16, 2011.
II.
This motion is not for delay but so that justice may be done.
Wherefore, Eolas respectfully requests that the Court grant the present Motion and extend
Eolas’ deadline for filing its Opposition Brief to Go Daddy’s Motion for Summary Judgment of
Non-Infringement until August 16, 2011.

2

DATED: August 3, 2011

Respectfully submitted,
McKOOL SMITH P.C.
By:

/s/ Mike McKool

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
/s/ Mike McKool
Mike McKool
Lead Attorney
Texas State Bar No. 13732100
[e-mail]
Douglas Cawley
Texas State Bar No. 04035500
[e-mail]
Holly Engelmann
Texas State Bar No. 24040865
[e-mail]
J.R. Johnson
Texas State Bar No. 24070000
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
Kevin L. Burgess
Texas State Bar No. 24006927
[e-mail]
Josh W. Budwin
Texas State Bar No. 24050347
[e-mail]
Gretchen K. Curran
Texas State Bar No. 24055979
[e-mail]
Matthew B. Rappaport
Texas State Bar No. 24070472
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC.

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who
have consented to electronic services on August 3, 2011. Local Rule CV-5(a))3)(A).

/s/ John B. Campbell
John B. Campbell

4