Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 818

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 790 SEALED MOTION Defendant Go Daddy's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Based On Its License Defense by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Plaintiff, vs. Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc., Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp., Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp., Playboy Enterprises International, Inc., Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC Defendants. § § § Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED § § § § JURY TRIAL § § § § § § § § § § § § § EOLAS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO GO DADDY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Incorporated (“Eolas”) files this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time for Eolas to Respond to Go Daddy’s Motion for Summary Judgment of NonInfringement and would show the Court the following: I. The Go Daddy Group, Inc. (“Go Daddy”) filed its Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement on July 25, 2011 (Dkt. No. 790). Pursuant to the Local Rules, Eolas’ Opposition Brief is due August 11, 2011. II. Eolas and Go Daddy (hereinafter “the parties”) have further discussed extending the deadline for Eolas’ Opposition Brief. Therefore, Eolas respectfully requests an extension of time to file its Opposition Brief to Go Daddy’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement until August 16, 2011. II. This motion is not for delay but so that justice may be done. Wherefore, Eolas respectfully requests that the Court grant the present Motion and extend Eolas’ deadline for filing its Opposition Brief to Go Daddy’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement until August 16, 2011. 2 DATED: August 3, 2011 Respectfully submitted, McKOOL SMITH P.C. By: /s/ Mike McKool MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. /s/ Mike McKool Mike McKool Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 13732100 mmckool@mckoolsmith.com Douglas Cawley Texas State Bar No. 04035500 dcawley@mckoolsmith.com Holly Engelmann Texas State Bar No. 24040865 hengelmann@mckoolsmith.com J.R. Johnson Texas State Bar No. 24070000 jjohnson@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 978-4000 Telecopier: (214) 978-4044 Kevin L. Burgess Texas State Bar No. 24006927 kburgess@mckoolsmith.com Josh W. Budwin Texas State Bar No. 24050347 jbudwin@mckoolsmith.com Gretchen K. Curran Texas State Bar No. 24055979 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com Matthew B. Rappaport Texas State Bar No. 24070472 mrappaport@mckoolsmith.com MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. 300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: (512) 692-8700 Telecopier: (512) 692-8744 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC. 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic services on August 3, 2011. Local Rule CV-5(a))3)(A). /s/ John B. Campbell John B. Campbell 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?