Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
849
Trial Witness List by Google Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Trial Witness List)(Jones, Michael)
Exhibit A
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC.,
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC.,
ARGOSY PUBLISHING, INC.,
BLOCKBUSTER INC., CDW CORP.,
CITIGROUP INC., EBAY INC., FRITOLAY, INC., THE GO DADDY GROUP,
INC., GOOGLE INC., J.C. PENNEY
COMPANY, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE
& CO., NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.,
OFFICE DEPOT, INC., PEROT
SYSTEMS CORP., PLAYBOY
ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
RENT-A-CENTER, INC., STAPLES,
INC., SUN MICROSYSTEMS INC.,
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC., YAHOO!
INC., and YOUTUBE, LLC
DEFENDANTS.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:09-CV-446
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND YOUTUBE LLC’S TRIAL WITNESS LIST
Pursuant to the Court’s Discovery Order and Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, Defendants Google Inc. and YouTube LLC (“together, “Google”) submit the following
lists of witnesses whom Google expects to present at trial, may call if the need arises, or expects to
present by deposition testimony. Google hereby incorporates by reference the witness lists of the
other defendants in this case. Google also reserves the right to call any Google, Eolas or third party
witness who may be deposed in this case. Google reserves the right to call as witnesses any
individuals found on Plaintiff Eolas Technologies Inc.’s (“Eolas”) witness list, or the witness list of
any of the other defendants in this lawsuit, and reserves the right to call additional rebuttal witnesses.
Google further identifies any persons identified in Eolas’ initial disclosures, interrogatory responses,
and expert reports not identified below.
Google reserves the right so supplement, augment, or otherwise modify this list based on
circumstances as they may evolve before commencement of trial. At this time, Google identifies the
following witnesses for trial:
Witness
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Valerie Blechar
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Albert Bodenhamer
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
John Boyd
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Bill Brougher
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Keith Coleman
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Benigne Deprey
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Jonathan Effrat
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Brian Fitzpatrick
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Shankar Ganesh
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Expect to
Present at Trial
May Call if
Need Arises
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
Expect to
Present by
Deposition
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
Matthew Gray
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Kevin Gough
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Chris Harrelson
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Kaustuv
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Job Lawrence
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Benjamin Lewis
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Mark Martel
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Shishir Mehrotra
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Jason Miller
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Sundar Pichai
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Carlos Pizano
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Brian Rakowski
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Bart Sears
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Prasad Setty
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Leor Stern
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Gideon Wald
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
3
X
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Hunter Walk
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Joel Webber
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Peter Alexander
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
M. Ray Perryman
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Dan Sadowski
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Richard Phillips
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
Nick Godici
Can be contacted through
counsel for Google
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
33. Tim Berners-Lee
X
X
34.
Chris McRae
X
X
36.
Tony Johnson
X
37.
David Thomson
X
38.
George Toye
X
39.
Bill Janssen
X
X
40.
Eric Bina
X
41.
Pei-Yuan Wei
X
42.
David Raggett
X
X
43.
Dale Dougherty
X
44.
Scott Silvey
45.
Marc Andreesen
46.
Karl Jacob
47.
Kurt Pires
X
X
X
X
4
48.
Apple Inc.
X
49.
Microsoft Corp.
X
50.
Regents of the University
of California
X
51.
Mozilla Foundation
X
52.
Charles Krueger
X
53.
Charles Kulas
X
54.
Cheong Ang
X
55.
James Stetson
X
56.
Mark Swords
X
57.
Michael D. Doyle
X
58.
David C. Martin
X
59.
Alicia Gackle
X
60.
Brandy Hernandez
X
5
Dated: August 12, 2011
/s/ Brandon H. Stroy
James R. Batchelder (pro hac vice)
james.batchelder@ropesgray.com
Sasha G. Rao (pro hac vice)
sasha.rao@ropesgray.com
Mark D. Rowland
mark.rowland@ropesgray.com
Brandon Stroy (pro hac vice)
brandon.stroy@ropesgray.com
Rebecca R. Hermes (pro hac vice)
rebecca.hermes@ropesgray.com
Lauren N. Robinson (pro hac vice)
lauren.robinson@ropesgray.com
Han Xu (pro hac vice)
han.xu@ropesgray.com
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor
East Palo Alto, California 94303-2284
Telephone: (650) 617-4000
Facsimile: (650) 617-4090
Michael E. Jones (Bar No. 10929400)
mikejones@potterminton.com
Allen F. Gardner (Bar No. 24043679)
allengardner@potterminton.com
POTTER MINTON
A Professional Corporation
110 N. College, Suite 500
Tyler, TX 75702
Telephone: (903) 597-8311
Facsimile:
(903) 593-0846
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
GOOGLE INC. & YOUTUBE LLC
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic
service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Local
Rule CV-5(a)(3), on this 12th day of August, 2011.
_/s/ Brandon H. Stroy_________
Brandon H. Stroy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?