Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
957
Joint MOTION to Vacate the Schedule and for Case Management Conference at the August 31, 2011 Hearing by Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon.com Inc., CDW Corporation, Citigroup Inc., Eolas Technologies Incorporated, Google Inc., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Staples, Inc., The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Healey, David)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED,
§
§
PLAINTIFF,
Civil Action No. 6:09-CV446-LED
§
v.
§
ADOBE SYSTEMS INC. et al.,
§
§
§
DEFENDANTS.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S AND SEVERAL DEFENDANTS’ JOINT
MOTION TO VACATE THE SCHEDULE AND FOR CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AT THE AUGUST 31, 2011 HEARING
The Court has considered the Motion of Plaintiff, Eolas Technologies
Incorporated (“Eolas”), and Several of the Defendants herein, Adobe Systems, Inc.,
Amazon, Inc., CDW, , Citigroup, Inc., Go-Daddy, Inc., Google, Inc., J.C. Penny, Inc.,
Staples, Inc., and Yahoo, Inc., to vacate the schedule (including pretrial and trial date); to
vacate all other due dates and deadlines pending amendment of the scheduling order; and
to put on the regular briefing schedule under Local Rule 7 the Plaintiff’s Motion to Join
the Regents of the University of California. These parties also request a case
management conference to be held at the August 31, 2011 hearing.
The Court Orders the Motion is GRANTED.
All deadlines and due dates in this case are VACATED, including the pretrial and
trial date.
The Plaintiff’s Motion to Join the Regents of the University of California is is put
on the regular briefing schedule under Local Rule 7.
The Court will take up case management issues at the August 31, 2011 hearing,
and the parties are to file a revised schedule within two weeks of the date of this Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?