Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 968

MOTION to Compel LOG-IN INFORMATION FOR STAPLESLINK.COM AND EWAY.COM FROM STAPLES INC. by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 21 Page 1 of 12 Gretchen Curran From: John B. Campbell Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 6:41 PM To: Hutchins, Kate; Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Kate, It is unreasonable to place any logistical burden on Eolas to inspect the accused products to prepare its case given that many (hundreds? thousands?) of companies have the same access to the accused websites that Eolas is seeking. It was also wholly unreasonable to require Eolas to travel to Boston to access these sites to generate the infringement contentions, particularly given that Staples represented these sites did not use the accused features. We hope Staples will consider reimbursing Eolas for this unnecessary expense. Thanks, John From: Hutchins, Kate [mailto:Kate.Hutchins@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 5:09 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Gretchen ‐‐   The reason articulated during the meet‐and‐confer was the burden and expense of going to Boston to  access the websites.  If there is some other reason that our proposed alternative is unacceptable to  Eolas, please let us know.   Kate   From: Gretchen Curran [mailto:gcurran@mckoolsmith.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 5:52 PM To: Hutchins, Kate; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Kate, Eolas will wait until 12:00 CST tomorrow to file the Motion to Compel. Should we learn before 12:00 CST that Staples agrees to provide log-in information to stapleslink.com and eway.com, contingent on the printouts from the websites being treated as highly confidential under the Protective Order, Eolas will not file its Motion to Compel, contingent on Staples agreeing to provide log-in information for stapleslink.com and eway.com by 9 AM CST Monday, September 12 and actually providing log-in information by 9 AM CST Monday, September 12. Such a contingency is necessary, given how long it took Staples to provide access to its analytics systems, even after it was ordered by the Court. 9/9/2011 Page 2 of 12 Access "under the same conditions on which [Staples] previously provided access" is an unacceptable alternative to log-in information for the reasons set forth in the meet and confer this afternoon. Best, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Hutchins, Kate [mailto:Kate.Hutchins@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 4:37 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Gretchen et al. -In an effort to avoid motion practice, we have reached out to our client to see if your proposed compromise -treating any printouts from the websites as highly confidential under the Protective Order -- is acceptable. We are unlikely to get an answer today, but we should have one by tomorrow. Can we plan to touch base then? If we still cannot agree, and you file your motion tomorrow, we can still agree to file our opposition on Wednesday so the agreed expedited briefing schedule will not be affected. In the meantime, one other possible compromise is that we provide additional access under the same conditions on which we've previously provided access, but in a city convenient to your counsel or experts. Please let us know if this alternative would be acceptable. Kate     From: Gretchen Curran [mailto:gcurran@mckoolsmith.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 4:30 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Hutchins, Kate; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Attached, please find Eolas' Unopposed Motion for Expedited Briefing on Eolas' Motion to Compel. If I do not hear back from you regarding any modifications to the attached Motion by 5:00 pm CST this evening, I will 9/9/2011 Page 3 of 12 assume you have no changes/objections to the content therein. Thank you, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Gretchen Curran Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:41 PM To: Hutchins, Kate; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Thank you, Kate! 4 pm Eastern on Thursday works. I will send a calendar invite with call-in information. Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Hutchins, Kate [mailto:Kate.Hutchins@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:25 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions I couldn't, but Michael and I could both do 4 pm Eastern on Thursday. 9/9/2011 Page 4 of 12   From: Gretchen Curran [mailto:gcurran@mckoolsmith.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:49 PM To: Hutchins, Kate; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; MRichardson@brsfirm.com Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Dear Kate, I wish that it worked--in the meantime of trying to schedule this, Mike McKool's schedule tomorrow has filled up. Could you do 2 pm Eastern on Thursday? Is Mike Richardson available then as well? Thank you! Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Hutchins, Kate [mailto:Kate.Hutchins@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 3:41 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Gretchen ‐‐   I am available tomorrow at 2 pm Eastern.  Would that work?   Kate   From: Gretchen Curran [mailto:gcurran@mckoolsmith.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:29 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Dear Kate, I just left you a voicemail repeating, in essence, my email below. Thanks 9/9/2011 Page 5 of 12 Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Gretchen Curran Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 1:51 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Dear Kate, Could you please let me know dates and times you are available for a meet and confer? Eolas seeks prompt resolution of the issue regarding log-in information for stapleslink.com and eway.com. Thank you, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Gretchen Curran Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:24 AM To: Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Thank you, Mark. Eolas agrees to permit Kate Hutchins to substitute for you on the meet and confer. 9/9/2011 Page 6 of 12 Best, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Matuschak, Mark [mailto:Mark.Matuschak@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:23 AM To: Gretchen Curran Cc: Gretchen Curran; Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: Re: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Gretchen As previously mentioned, I'm not available until Friday. If you will agree to permit Kate Hutchins to substitute for me on this meet and confer, I'll check with her as she probably can do it sooner. Otherwise, please propose times when you are available on Friday. Regards, Mark On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:51 AM, "Gretchen Curran" <gcurran@mckoolsmith.com> wrote: Dear Mark, Staples' delay in conducting an L.R. 7 and reaching a resolution and, if not possible, seeking Court intervention regarding log-in information for stapleslink.com and eway.com prejudices Eolas' ability to complete its supplemental expert reports. As you indicated in your email on Friday, you apparently are available for a meet and confer this Friday; however, Eolas would like to obtain a prompt resolution of this issue. Thus, please let me know all dates/times you are available this week. Thank you, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 9/9/2011 Page 7 of 12 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEYCLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this email by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Gretchen Curran Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 6:03 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; Mike McKool; Douglas A. Cawley Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Dear Mark, I did not hear back from you regarding your availability for the L.R. 7 meet and confer on the issue regarding access to stapleslink.com and eway.com. Eolas seeks prompt resolution of the issue through discussions between the parties on the L.R. 7 call or, if necessary, through Court involvement, as expert reports necessarily depend on such access. Waiting an entire week for an L.R. 7 does not allow us to obtain prompt resolution. Please provide all dates/times next week you are available for the L.R. 7. Best, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEYCLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this email by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Gretchen Curran Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 2:15 PM To: Matuschak, Mark Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer; Mike McKool; Douglas A. Cawley Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions 9/9/2011 Page 8 of 12 Mark, While we are happy to discuss this issue as long as this takes, we suspect that, given your position, the meet and confer will not take long. Have you no time in the next week, prior to Friday, to conduct a meet and confer? Given the importance of the issue, we would like to have an L.R. 7 soon in the hopes of getting the issue resolved, and if that fails, get our motion to compel on file. Thank you, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEYCLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this email by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Matuschak, Mark [mailto:Mark.Matuschak@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 2:00 PM To: Gretchen Curran Cc: Hardt, Jonathan; Eolas; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: Re: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions We're not sending them log in codes. I can do the call next Friday. On Sep 2, 2011, at 2:34 PM, "Gretchen Curran" <gcurran@mckoolsmith.com> wrote: Dear Jonathan, There was no such agreement that Eolas would not need further access to the accused websites to draft expert reports for infringement and damages. Eolas merely seeks login codes for these publicly available websites that can easily be sent in an email without delay. If Staples is refusing to provide such log-in codes for the accused websites, please provide what times on Tuesday, September 6th Staples' local/lead counsel are available for an L.R. 7 meet and confer. Kind regards, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 9/9/2011 Page 9 of 12 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Hardt, Jonathan [mailto:Jonathan.Hardt@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 12:46 PM To: Gretchen Curran Cc: Eolas; Matuschak, Mark; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Gretchen, Prior to scheduling any LR7 conference, please fully respond to our e‐mail.  We would like an  explanation why your team now needs more review given its claims to already have sufficient  information to determine that these websites infringe and given the parties' preexisting  agreement. Regards,  Jonathan From: Gretchen Curran [mailto:gcurran@mckoolsmith.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 11:40 AM To: Hardt, Jonathan Cc: Eolas; Matuschak, Mark; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Dear Jonathan, Eolas' lead counsel is available on Tuesday for an L.R. 7 meet and confer on this issue. Please let me know what times on Tuesday your local/lead counsel are available, as Eolas intends to file its motion to compel on Tuesday should a resolution not be reached. Kind regards, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately 9/9/2011 Page 10 of 12 destroyed. From: Hardt, Jonathan [mailto:Jonathan.Hardt@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:40 AM To: Gretchen Curran Cc: Eolas; Matuschak, Mark; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate; Ewenstein, Richard I; Hardt, Jonathan; Williams, Daniel V.; Bob Kramer Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Gretchen, I'm responding to your e‐mail to Dan Williams.  As you are aware, Staples explicitly agreed it  would not object to Eolas amending its infringement contentions if and only if Eolas would  agree on a universe of documents it needed related to those amended contentions.   We  agreed on a list of documents and you did not ask for additional review or other material at  that time.  In reliance on your statements about the documents to which you would agree to  limit your request, Staples consented to Eolas' motion to amend.  Having now obtained that  amendment without opposition, you seek to change our agreement.   Further, given that your expert already reviewed the sites, printed more than 100 pages from  them, and, thereafter Eolas amended its infringement contentions, it is apparent that Eolas  already has all of the information it claims to need to assert that these websites infringe  Eolas' patents.  Your request for further review seems plainly designed merely to harass  Staples, change the parties' agreement, and not for any legitimate purpose. Notwithstanding all of the above, if you can explain why Eolas ‐ which already claims to have  sufficient information to determine that these websites infringe ‐ needs yet more review, we  will consider your request in good faith.   Regards, Jonathan From: Gretchen Curran [mailto:gcurran@mckoolsmith.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:23 PM To: Gretchen Curran; Williams, Daniel V. Cc: Eolas; Bob Kramer; Matuschak, Mark; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Dan, In addition to the damages documents related to stapleslink.com and eway.com, which are necessary for Mr. Weinstein to complete his supplemental report for damages, Eolas also requires access to stapleslink.com and eway.com in order for Dr. Martin to complete his supplemental report for infringement. Now that those two websites are accused in this case, no reason exists to withhold log-in information from Eolas in order for its experts to access those two websites. Please let me know when (1) production will take place of the damages documents to which you agreed; and (2) Eolas will receive log-in information for stapleslink.com and eway.com. Kind regards, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly 9/9/2011 Page 11 of 12 prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Gretchen Curran Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 4:40 PM To: Williams, Daniel V. Cc: Eolas; Bob Kramer; Matuschak, Mark; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Thank you for your email, Dan. Can you please let us know when Staples intends to produce the damages documents it agreed to produce related to stapleslink.com and eway.com? Mr. Weinstein cannot complete a supplemental report in the absence of such documents. Kind regards, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. From: Williams, Daniel V. [mailto:Daniel.Williams@wilmerhale.com] Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 4:32 PM To: Gretchen Curran Cc: Eolas; Bob Kramer; Matuschak, Mark; Steinberg, Don; Hutchins, Kate Subject: RE: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Gretchen, I write in response to the Supplemental Infringement Contentions served yesterday to Staples  for stapleslink.com and eway.com.  Can you please let us know when Dr. Martin and Mr.  Weinstein plan to supplement their reports to include the newly accused Staples features?   Staples will supplement its non‐infringement and damages rebuttal reports, within ten days  after receiving Dr. Martin's and Mr. Weinstein's supplemental reports, to address the newly  accused features. Regards, Dan From: Gretchen Curran [mailto:gcurran@mckoolsmith.com] Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 1:25 PM To: Eolas Defendants; Hardt, Jonathan; Hutchins, Kate; Matuschak, Mark; Matuschak, Mark Cc: Eolas; Bob Kramer Subject: Eolas v. Adobe - Staples' Infringement Contentions Dear Counsel, In light of the Court's order requiring Eolas to "serve supplemental infringement contentions against Staples for the stapleslink.com and eway.com websites within three 9/9/2011 Page 12 of 12 days of this Order", please find such contentions attached hereto. Kind regards, Gretchen Gretchen K. Curran | Attorney | McKool Smith P.C. 300 West 6th Street | Suite 1700 | Austin, Texas 78701 O: 512-692-8741 | F: 512-692-8744 | 512-897-7726 gcurran@mckoolsmith.com | www.mckoolsmith.com NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in and transmitted with this email is SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES AND IS CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by or to anyone other than the addressee named above by the sender is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed. 9/9/2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?