Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 991

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File A RESPONSE BRIEF TO DEFENDANT ADOBE'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT BASED ON ITS LICENSE DEFENSE by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(McKool, Mike)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Eolas Technologies Incorporated,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Adobe Systems Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.,
Apple Inc., Argosy Publishing, Inc.,
Blockbuster Inc., CDW Corp.,
Citigroup Inc., eBay Inc., Frito-Lay, Inc.,
The Go Daddy Group, Inc., Google Inc.,
J.C. Penney Company, Inc., JPMorgan
Chase & Co., New Frontier Media, Inc.,
Office Depot, Inc., Perot Systems Corp.,
Playboy Enterprises International, Inc.,
Rent-A-Center, Inc., Staples, Inc., Sun
Microsystems Inc., Texas Instruments Inc.,
Yahoo! Inc., and YouTube, LLC
Defendants.

§
§
§ Civil Action No. 6:09-CV-00446-LED
§
§
§
§
JURY TRIAL
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

EOLAS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE FILE A RESPONSE BRIEF TO
DEFENDANT ADOBE’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
NONINFRINGEMENT BASED ON ITS LICENSE DEFENSE

McKool 399588v1

Eolas Technologies, Inc. (“Eolas”) moves for leave to file a response brief to Defendant
Adobe’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Based on Its License
Defense. On August 17, 2011, Adobe, Inc. (“Adobe”) sought leave to file Defendant Adobe’s
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Based on Its License Defense and
exceed the collective 60-page limit for summary judgment briefing. Dkt. No. 871. The Court
granted Adobe’s motion for leave. Dkt. No. 893.
Eolas hereby requests leave to file an opposition brief to Defendant Adobe’s Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment of Noninfringement Based on Its License Defense and exceed the
collective 60-page limit for responses to summary judgment motions. L.R. 7(a)(3). Eolas
requests leave to file an 11-page response brief—the same length as Adobe’s 11-page summary
judgment motion.

McKool 399588v1

Dated: September 28, 2011.

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
/s/ Mike McKool
Mike McKool
Lead Attorney
Texas State Bar No. 13732100
[e-mail]
Douglas Cawley
Texas State Bar No. 04035500
[e-mail]
Holly Engelmann
Texas State Bar No. 24040865
[e-mail]
J.R. Johnson
Texas State Bar No. 24070000
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Telecopier: [phone]
Kevin L. Burgess
Texas State Bar No. 24006927
[e-mail]
Josh W. Budwin
Texas State Bar No. 24050347
[e-mail]
Gretchen K. Curran
Texas State Bar No. 24055979
[e-mail]
Matthew B. Rappaport
Texas State Bar No. 24070472
[e-mail]
MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.
300 West Sixth Street, Suite 1700
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Telecopier: [phone]

McKool 399588v1

Robert M. Parker
Texas State Bar No. 15498000
[e-mail]
Robert Christopher Bunt
Texas Bar No. 00787165
[e-mail]
Andrew T. Gorham
Texas State Bar No. 24012715
[e-mail]
PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C.
100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114
Tyler, Texas 75702
[phone]
[phone]- Facsimile
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INC.
AND THE REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

McKool 399588v1

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
Counsel for Eolas has conferred with counsel for Adobe regarding the relief requested in
this Motion. Defendant is unopposed to the relief requested in this Motion

/s/ John B. Campbell
John B. Campbell

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in
compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who have
consented to electronic services pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A), on September 28, 2011.
/s/ John B. Campbell
John B. Campbell

McKool 399588v1