Eolas Technologies Incorporated v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 997

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Leonard Davis: Motion Hearing held on 9/21/2011 re 965 MOTION for Reconsideration re 914 Memorandum & Opinion, EOLAS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER CONSTRUCTION OF "EXECUTABLE APPLICATION" IN MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DKT. NO. 914) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CERTIFY THE QUESTION FOR INTERLO MOTION for Reconsideration re 914 Memorandum & Opinion, EOLAS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER CONSTRUCTION OF "EXECUTABLE APPLICATION" IN MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (DKT. NO. 914) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO CERTIFY THE QUESTION FOR INTERLO filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated, 890 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AS A CO-PLAINTIFF filed by Eolas Technologies Incorporated. (Court Reporter Shea Sloan.) (Attachments: # 1 Attorney Sign-In Sheets) (rlf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

DATE: September 21, 2011
REPORTER: Shea Sloan

JUDGE
LEONARD DAVIS
LAW CLERKS: Allan Bullwinkel / Nicole Mitchell

EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES
INCORPORATED

CIVIL ACTION NO: 6:09-CV-446

V

MOTIONS HEARING

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

SEE SIGN-IN SHEETS
On this day, came the parties by their attorneys and the following proceedings were had:
OPEN: 2:25 pm
TIME:
2:25 pm

ADJOURN: 4:05 pm

MINUTES:
Case called. PARTIES ANNOUNCED READY. (SEE SIGN-IN SHEETS)
Court addressed parties regarding Motion for Reconsideration.
Mr. Burgess presented Eolas’s Motion to Reconsider (Doc. No. 965).
Mr. Batchelder responded. Mr. Burgess replied.
Court will take matter under advisement.
Court addressed the parties Motion to Add Regents and Motion to Dismiss.
Mr. Parker presented Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint to Add the Regents
of the University of California as a Co-Plaintiff (Doc. No. 890).
Mr. Reines responded to the Motion to Amend. Court would like to hear from Adobe. Mr.
Florey addressed the Court on behalf of Adobe. Mr. Reines continued his argument on the
Motion to Amend. Ms. Doan addressed the Court. Mr. Parker replied.
Mr. Campbell addressed the Court on the depositions. Mr. Reines responded.

DAVID J. MALAND, CLERK
FILED: 9.21.2011
BY: Rosa L. Ferguson, Courtroom Deputy

PAGE 2 - Proceedings Continued
TIME:

MINUTES:
Court addressed he parties on severing Adobe, bring Regents in and check with the
discovery. Mr. Doan addressed the Court and asked for clarification. Mr. Campbell further
addressed the Court. Mr. Reines responded.
Court denies Adobe’s motion as moot and will add the Regents.
Court addressed the parties on the alternative pleading on the Motion to Reconsider as far
as certifying the question.
Mr. Burgess addressed the Court on the Interlocutory Appeal. Court inquired about the
litigation while the appeal is pending, Mr. Burgess indicated that the case should be stayed.
Mr. Reines responded and if the 1292 be granted, there should be a stay. Mr. Florey
concurred that the case should be stayed.
Court will get a ruling as soon as it can.

4:05 pm

There being nothing further, Court adjourned.