Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al
Filing
115
RESPONSE in Support re 98 MOTION to Substitute Party Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) MOTION to Substitute Party Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(c) filed by Uniloc Singapore Private Limited, Uniloc USA, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Ward, Thomas)
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al
Doc. 115 Att. 2
Exhibit
B
Dockets.Justia.com
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF BRADLEY C. DAVIS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS UNILOC USA, INC. AND UNILOC (SINGAPORE) PRIVATE LIMITED'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTIES PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 25(c) I, Bradley C. Davis, do declare and state as follows: 1. I am the Chief Executive Officer of Plaintiff Uniloc USA, Inc. ("Uniloc") and I
have worked at Uniloc for more than seven (7) years. 2. 3. 4. 5. I am on the Board of Directors of Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited. I am on the Board of Directors of Uniloc USA, Inc. I am on the Board of Directors of Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. In addition to myself, S Sivanesan is the only other Director on the Board of
Directors for Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited. 6. S Sivanesan is a partner at the law firm of Rodyk & Davidson LLP serves as local
counsel in Singapore for Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited and Uniloc USA, Inc. 7. Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited's physical address is the address of the law
firm Rodyk & Davidson LLP in Singapore which is 80 Raffles Place, #33-00 UOB Plaza 1, Singapore 048624. 8. facilities. 9. Documents related to Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited, otherwise not Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited has no employees, no officers, and no
publically available, are maintained by Uniloc's counsel S Sivanesan and are under the custody and control of Uniloc USA, Inc. 10. A copy of the documents in Uniloc (Singapore) Private Limited possession,
custody or control have been transferred to Uniloc USA, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?