Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP. et al

Filing 249

MOTION for Leave to Address File History Disclaimer Issues, Arising From the Recent Reexamination, in the Upcoming Claim Construction Proceeings by Adobe Systems Inc., Alladin Knowledge Systems Ltd., Alladin Knowledge Systems, Inc., FileMaker, Inc., NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP., Onyx Graphics, Inc., Pervasive Software, Inc., Pinnacle Systems, Inc., Safenet, Inc., Sonic Solutions, Symantec Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Claim Construction Letter, # 2 Text of Proposed Order, # 3 Text of Proposed Order Alternate Order)(Gardner, Allen)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
ET AL.
Defendants.
UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
DISK DOCTORS LABS, INC., ET AL.
Defendants.
UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORP., ET
AL.
Defendants.

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ENGRASP, INC., ET AL.
Defendants.

{A07/7643/0005/W0484114.1 }

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:10-CV-373
PATENT CASE

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:10-CV-471
PATENT CASE

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:10-CV-472
PATENT CASE

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:10-CV-591
PATENT CASE

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
BMC SOFTWARE, INC., ET AL.
Defendants.

UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
FOXIT CORPORATION, ET AL.
Defendants.

SYMANTEC CORPORATION, ET AL.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNILOC USA, INC., ET AL.
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:10-CV-636
PATENT CASE

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:10-CV-691
PATENT CASE

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 6:11-CV-33
PATENT CASE

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ADDRESS FILE
HISTORY DISCLAIMER ISSUES, ARISING FROM THE RECENT
REEXAMINATION, IN THE UPCOMING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS
The Court, having considered the Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Address File History
Disclaimer Issues, Arising from the Recent Reexamination, In the Upcoming Claim Construction
Proceedings, Hereby Orders that no leave was or is required in connection with the prosecution
history disclaimer issues that Defendants have raised in the Patent Rule 4-3 Joint Claim
Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement, and expects the parties to address these issues in the
claim construction briefing.

{A07/7643/0005/W0484114.1 }