WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
185
RESPONSE in Opposition re 174 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment that Patent Claims Are Indefinite filed by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Jonathan Wells, # 2 Exhibit 1 - ISO Declaration of Jonathan Wells - Jonathan Wells CV, # 3 Exhibit B - Wi-Lan's proposed constructions for "means" terms, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., et al.
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER
The Court has considered Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and The Ericsson Defendants’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Patent Claims are Indefinite dated March 30, 2012,
Dkt. 174 and is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and The Ericsson
Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Patent Claims are Indefinite, is DENIED
in its entirety.
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
