WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 204

Joint MOTION for Protective Order FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER BETWEEN WI-LAN INC., NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INC., AND SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB AND SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC. by Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - STIPULATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER BETWEEN WI-LAN,INC., NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INC., SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB AND SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.)(Pai, Ajeet)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI–LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10–CV–521–LED ALCATEL–LUCENT USA INC., et al., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER BETWEEN WI-LAN INC., NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INC., AND SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB AND SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC. Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc., Defendants Sony Mobile Communications AB and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. (collectively, “Sony Mobile”), and Non-Party Qualcomm Inc. have met and conferred, and hereby jointly move the Court to enter the Stipulation for Supplemental Protective Order attached hereto as Exhibit A. 1 Dated: June 23, 2012 Respectfully submitted, By: Local Counsel Johnny Ward Texas State Bar No. 00794818 Wesley Hill Texas State Bar No. 24032294 WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM 111 W. Tyler Street Longview, TX 75601 Tel: (903) 757-6400 Fax: (903-757-2323 jw@jwfirm.com wh@jwfirm.com /s/ Ajeet P. Pai David B. Weaver – LEAD ATTORNEY Texas State Bar No. 00798576 Michael A. Valek Texas State Bar No. 24044028 Avelyn M. Ross Texas State Bar No. 24027817 Ajeet P. Pai Texas State Bar No. 24060376 Syed K. Fareed Texas State Bar No. 24065216 Jeffrey T. Han Texas State Bar No. 24069870 Seth A. Lindner Texas State Bar No. 24078862 VINSON & ELKINS LLP 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746 Tel: (512) 542-8400 Fax: (512) 542-8612 dweaver@velaw.com mvalek@velaw.com aross@velaw.com apai@velaw.com sfareed@velaw.com jhan@velaw.com slindner@velaw.com Charles P. Ebertin VINSON & ELKINS LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 410 Palo Alto, CA 94301-1918 Tel: (650) 617-8400 cebertin@velaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wi-LAN Inc. By: /s/ Richard L. Wynne, Jr. Bruce S. Sostek (Lead Attorney) Texas State Bar No. 18855700 Richard L. Wynne, Jr. 2 Texas State Bar No. 24003214 Matthew P. Harper Texas State Bar No. 24037777 THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP 1722 Routh Street, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Tel: (214) 969-1700 Fax: (214)969-1751 Bruce.Sostek@tklaw.com Richard.Wynne@tklaw.com Matt.Harper@tklaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Sony Mobile Communications AB and Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc. By: /s/ David A. Kays David A. Kays MORGAN FRANICH FREDKIN & MARCH 99 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1000 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: (408) 288-9545 Fax: (408) 288-8325 dkays@mffmlaw.com Attorneys for Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h), movant has contacted counsel for Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson; Ericsson Inc.; Sony Mobile Communications AB; Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.; HTC Corporation; HTC America, Inc.; and Exedea Inc.; and no party opposes the relief requested herein. /s/ Ajeet P. Pai Ajeet P. Pai 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(d) and (e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by email and/or fax, on this the 22nd day of June, 2012. /s/ Ajeet P. Pai Ajeet P. Pai 508322 000010 DALLAS 2880013.1 US 1459430v.1 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?