WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 245

Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct Docket Control Order by Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Findlay, Eric)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN, INC. Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON; ERICSSON INC.; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INS.; HTC CORPORATION; HTC AMERICA, INC.; EXEDEA INC.; LG ELECTRONICS, INC.; LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM U.S.A., INC.; AND LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC. Defendants. ______________________________________ § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED JURY TRIAL DEMANDED UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND DOCKET CONTROL ORDER Defendants HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby file their Unopposed Motion to Amend Docket Control Order. Plaintiff Wi-LAN, Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) does not oppose this Motion. Defendants move the Court to amend the Docket Control Order (Dkt. No. 99, as amended by Dkt. Nos. 216, 226, 232, 238 and 242) as follows: Defendants and Wi-LAN have jointly agreed to extend the date for Defendants’ responsive expert report concerning damages to November 9, 2012. Defendants and Wi-LAN have also agreed to extend the deadline for expert discovery of Defendants’ experts concerning Defendants’ damages report up to and including December 21, 2012. The proposed modifications are necessary to allow sufficient time for Defendants’ expert to respond to Plaintiff’s expert report on damages and to permit the parties to complete the depositions of both parties’ damages experts. With the exception of the dates above, all other dates currently specified by the Docket Control Order would remain unchanged, with the relevant pre-trial and trial dates unaffected. Accordingly, Defendants respectfully request that the Court enter the attached proposed Order effecting the above modifications. Dated: November 2, 2012 Respectfully submitted By /s/ Eric H. Findlay Stephen S. Korniczky Daniel N. Yannuzzi Martin Bader Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP 12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92130 Telephone: (858) 720-8900 Facsimile: (858) 509-3691 skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com dyannuzzi@sheppardmullin.com mbader@sheppardmullin.com Local Consel Brian Craft State Bar No. 04972020 Eric H. Findlay State Bar No. 00789886 Findlay Craft, LLP 6760 Old Jacksonville Hwy., Suite 101 Tyler, TX 75703 903/534-1100 Fax: 903/534-1137 efindlay@findlaycraft.com 2 Attorneys for Defendants HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC. and EXEDEA, INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that on November 2, 2012, the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this document was served on all counsel who are deemed to have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(b)(1). /s/ Eric H. Findlay Eric H. Findlay CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I hereby certify that on November 2, 2012, counsel for Defendants conferred with Ajeet Pai, counsel for Plaintiff, regarding this motion. Counsel for Plaintiff stated that Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. /s/ Eric H. Findlay Eric H. Findlay 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?