WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 463

RESPONSE to Motion re 459 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW THAT CLAIMS 2 AND 5 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,381,211, CLAIMS 2, 5, AND 9 OF U.S. PATENT NO.6,088,326, AND CLAIM 11 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,222,819 ARE NOT INFRI nged filed by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Borgman, Steven)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-252-LED CONSOLIDATED CASES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER The Court, having considered Defendants’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law that Claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211, Claims 2, 5, and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326, and Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819 Are Not Infringed and Invalid, and Claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,195,327 Are Not Infringed (“Motion”), the response thereto, and the papers filed in this action, is of the opinion that the same should be DENIED. It is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendants’ Motion is hereby DENIED. 23

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?