WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
475
MOTION for Attorney Fees by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Sostek, Bruce)
EXHIBIT B
Ajeet P. Pai apai@velaw.com
Tel +1.512.542.8798 Fax +1.512.236.3317
September 21, 2012
By Email
Akshay S. Deoras
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
601 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Re:
Bruce Sostek
Thompson & Knight LLP
1722 Routh Street
Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
Martin R. Bader
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter &
Hampton LLP
12275 El Camino Real. #200
San Diego, CA 92130-2006
Wi-LAN v. Alcatel-Lucent USA et al. (10-cv-521) (E.D. Tex.)
Counsel:
This letter is to inform you that Wi-LAN will serve expert reports related to
infringement of the following claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,088,326, 6,195,327, 6,222,819, and
6,381,211:
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.:
’326 Patent claims 1-10;
’327 Patent claims 1, 5, 8, 10-13, 15;
’819 Patent claim 11.
Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM
Ericsson:
’326 Patent claims 1-10;
’327 Patent claims 1, 5, 8, 10-13, 15;
’819 Patent claim 11.
HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc.,
Exedea Inc.:
’211 Patent claims 1-5.
Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony
Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.:
’211 Patent claims 1-5.
Wi-LAN no longer asserts that Defendants’ accused products infringe the remaining
claims identified in Wi-LAN’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures.
Sincerely,
/s/ Ajeet Pai
Ajeet P. Pai
Vinson & Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law
2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100
Abu Dhabi Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Hong Kong Houston London Moscow
Austin, TX 78746-7568
New York Palo Alto Riyadh San Francisco Shanghai Tokyo Washington
US1577175v1
Tel +1.512.542.8400 Fax +1.512.542.8612 www.velaw.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?