WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 475

MOTION for Attorney Fees by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Sostek, Bruce)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT B Ajeet P. Pai apai@velaw.com Tel +1.512.542.8798 Fax +1.512.236.3317 September 21, 2012 By Email Akshay S. Deoras Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10022 Re: Bruce Sostek Thompson & Knight LLP 1722 Routh Street Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201 Martin R. Bader Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP 12275 El Camino Real. #200 San Diego, CA 92130-2006 Wi-LAN v. Alcatel-Lucent USA et al. (10-cv-521) (E.D. Tex.) Counsel: This letter is to inform you that Wi-LAN will serve expert reports related to infringement of the following claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,088,326, 6,195,327, 6,222,819, and 6,381,211: Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.: ’326 Patent claims 1-10; ’327 Patent claims 1, 5, 8, 10-13, 15; ’819 Patent claim 11. Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson: ’326 Patent claims 1-10; ’327 Patent claims 1, 5, 8, 10-13, 15; ’819 Patent claim 11. HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Exedea Inc.: ’211 Patent claims 1-5. Sony Mobile Communications AB, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.: ’211 Patent claims 1-5. Wi-LAN no longer asserts that Defendants’ accused products infringe the remaining claims identified in Wi-LAN’s P.R. 3-1 disclosures. Sincerely, /s/ Ajeet Pai Ajeet P. Pai Vinson & Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Abu Dhabi Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Hong Kong Houston London Moscow Austin, TX 78746-7568 New York Palo Alto Riyadh San Francisco Shanghai Tokyo Washington US1577175v1 Tel +1.512.542.8400 Fax +1.512.542.8612 www.velaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?