WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 481

MOTION for New Trial CONCERNING THE NON-INFRINGEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 AND 6,381,211 by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Trial Transcript (July 9, 2013 Morning Session), # 2 Exhibit B - Trial Transcript (July 11, 2013 Morning Session), # 3 Exhibit C - Trial Transcript (July 11, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 4 Exhibit D - Trial Transcript (July 10, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 5 Exhibit E - PX-1 - U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326, # 6 Exhibit F - PX-2 - U.S. Patent No. 6,195,327, # 7 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)

Download PDF
WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al Doc. 481 Att. 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-252-LED CONSOLIDATED CASES JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER The Court, having considered Wi-LAN Inc.’s Motion For A New Trial Concerning The Non-Infringement Of Certain Claims Of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 And 6,381,211, the response thereto, and the papers filed in this action, is of the opinion that W i- LAN’s Motion For A New Trial should be GRANTED. It is therefore, ORDER ED, ADJ UDGED a nd DECREED that the jury verdict finding non-infringement of claims 2, 5 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326, claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819, claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211, and claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,195,327 are set aside. It is further ORDERED that a new trial shall be conducted to determ ine the infringement of claims 2, 5 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326, claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 6,222,819, claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211, and claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,195,327. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?