WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
481
MOTION for New Trial CONCERNING THE NON-INFRINGEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 AND 6,381,211 by WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Trial Transcript (July 9, 2013 Morning Session), # 2 Exhibit B - Trial Transcript (July 11, 2013 Morning Session), # 3 Exhibit C - Trial Transcript (July 11, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 4 Exhibit D - Trial Transcript (July 10, 2013 Afternoon Session), # 5 Exhibit E - PX-1 - U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326, # 6 Exhibit F - PX-2 - U.S. Patent No. 6,195,327, # 7 Text of Proposed Order)(Weaver, David)
WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Doc. 481 Att. 7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC.; et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 6:10-cv-521-LED
Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-252-LED
CONSOLIDATED CASES
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER
The Court, having considered Wi-LAN Inc.’s Motion For A New Trial Concerning The
Non-Infringement Of Certain Claims Of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 And
6,381,211, the response thereto, and the papers filed
in this action, is of the opinion that W
i-
LAN’s Motion For A New Trial should be GRANTED.
It is therefore, ORDER ED, ADJ UDGED a nd DECREED that the jury verdict finding
non-infringement of claims 2, 5 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326, claim 11 of U.S. Patent No.
6,222,819, claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211, and claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No.
6,195,327 are set aside. It is further ORDERED that a new trial shall be conducted to determ ine
the infringement of claims 2, 5 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,088,326, claim 11 of U.S. Patent No.
6,222,819, claims 2 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,381,211, and claims 11 and 12 of U.S. Patent No.
6,195,327.
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?