WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 492

RESPONSE to Motion re 481 MOTION for New Trial CONCERNING THE NON-INFRINGEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 AND 6,381,211 filed by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Markman Transcript, # 2 Exhibit B: Trial Transcript, # 3 Exhibit C: Trial Transcript, # 4 Exhibit D: Trial Transcript, # 5 Exhibit E: Trial Transcript, # 6 Exhibit F: PX 1, # 7 Exhibit G: PX 2, # 8 Exhibit H: PX 3, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Heinlen, James)

EXHIBIT E

Page 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION

2
3

WI-LAN, INC.

)

4

DOCKET NO. 6:10cv521
-vs-

5

6
7
8

9
10

)

Tyler, Texas
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC.,
9:01 a.m.
ET AL
)
July 12, 2013
******************************************************
WI-LAN, INC.
)
DOCKET NO. 6:13cv252
-vs)
HTC CORPORATION,
ET AL
)

11
12
13
14

15

TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
MORNING SESSION
BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS,
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY

16
17
18
19
20

21

22

COURT REPORTERS:

MS. SHEA SLOAN
MS. JUDY WERLINGER
211 W. Ferguson
Tyler, Texas 75702
[e-mail]

23
24

25

Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was
produced by a Computer.

Page 11
1

ANSWER:

We have -- we refer to it as an

2

overlay code, which is a direct sequence CDMA spreading

3

code.

4

which is another direct sequence of CDMA spreading code.

And then we have what we refer to as an RW code,

5

QUESTION:

So in the system of the '819

6

patent, an information signal is spread using an RW

7

code, and then is spread with a separate spreading

8

code -- which you call an overlay code, correct?

9

ANSWER:

The order of the process is that

10

the data is first spread by an overlay code which in our

11

description is an RW code, and then is subsequently

12

spread by another direct sequence code which is an RW

13

code, the two codes being independent of each other.

14

QUESTION:

The '327 patent relates to

15

removing an RW code -- an RW channel, I think is what

16

you said?

17

ANSWER:

That's -- that's one of the

18

aspects of the invention in that having an air interface

19

that we -- that has RW codes that can be removed allows

20

the '327 patent to work.

21

QUESTION:

And when you say RW codes can

22

be removed, you mean taking those codes out of service

23

so that no subscriber is using those codes, correct?

24
25

ANSWER:

Taking the -- taking the codes

out of service is the -- is the way we -- is the way we

Page 106
1

CERTIFICATION

2
3

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a

4

true and correct transcript from the stenographic notes

5

of the proceedings in the above-entitled matter to the

6

best of our abilities.

7
8
9

/s/ Shea Sloan
SHEA SLOAN, CSR

10

Official Court Reporter
State of Texas No.:

11

Expiration Date:

3081

12/31/14

12
13

/s/ Judith Werlinger
14

JUDITH WERLINGER, CSR
Deputy Official Court Reporter

15

State of Texas No.:
Expiration Date

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

731

12/31/14