WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 492

RESPONSE to Motion re 481 MOTION for New Trial CONCERNING THE NON-INFRINGEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 AND 6,381,211 filed by Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Ericsson Inc., Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Markman Transcript, # 2 Exhibit B: Trial Transcript, # 3 Exhibit C: Trial Transcript, # 4 Exhibit D: Trial Transcript, # 5 Exhibit E: Trial Transcript, # 6 Exhibit F: PX 1, # 7 Exhibit G: PX 2, # 8 Exhibit H: PX 3, # 9 Text of Proposed Order)(Heinlen, James)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT E Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION 2 3 WI-LAN, INC. ) 4 DOCKET NO. 6:10cv521 -vs- 5 6 7 8 9 10 ) Tyler, Texas ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., 9:01 a.m. ET AL ) July 12, 2013 ****************************************************** WI-LAN, INC. ) DOCKET NO. 6:13cv252 -vs) HTC CORPORATION, ET AL ) 11 12 13 14 15 TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL MORNING SESSION BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 COURT REPORTERS: MS. SHEA SLOAN MS. JUDY WERLINGER 211 W. Ferguson Tyler, Texas 75702 shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov 23 24 25 Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was produced by a Computer. Page 11 1 ANSWER: We have -- we refer to it as an 2 overlay code, which is a direct sequence CDMA spreading 3 code. 4 which is another direct sequence of CDMA spreading code. And then we have what we refer to as an RW code, 5 QUESTION: So in the system of the '819 6 patent, an information signal is spread using an RW 7 code, and then is spread with a separate spreading 8 code -- which you call an overlay code, correct? 9 ANSWER: The order of the process is that 10 the data is first spread by an overlay code which in our 11 description is an RW code, and then is subsequently 12 spread by another direct sequence code which is an RW 13 code, the two codes being independent of each other. 14 QUESTION: The '327 patent relates to 15 removing an RW code -- an RW channel, I think is what 16 you said? 17 ANSWER: That's -- that's one of the 18 aspects of the invention in that having an air interface 19 that we -- that has RW codes that can be removed allows 20 the '327 patent to work. 21 QUESTION: And when you say RW codes can 22 be removed, you mean taking those codes out of service 23 so that no subscriber is using those codes, correct? 24 25 ANSWER: Taking the -- taking the codes out of service is the -- is the way we -- is the way we Page 106 1 CERTIFICATION 2 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a 4 true and correct transcript from the stenographic notes 5 of the proceedings in the above-entitled matter to the 6 best of our abilities. 7 8 9 /s/ Shea Sloan SHEA SLOAN, CSR 10 Official Court Reporter State of Texas No.: 11 Expiration Date: 3081 12/31/14 12 13 /s/ Judith Werlinger 14 JUDITH WERLINGER, CSR Deputy Official Court Reporter 15 State of Texas No.: Expiration Date 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 731 12/31/14

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?