WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 504

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 481 MOTION for New Trial CONCERNING THE NON-INFRINGEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 AND 6,381,211 filed by Ericsson Inc., Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A -- Trial Tr. July 12 2013 AM, # 2 Exhibit B -- Trial Tr. July 15 2013)(Wynne, Richard)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT B Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION 2 3 WI-LAN, INC. ) 4 DOCKET NO. 6:10cv521 -vs- 5 6 7 8 9 10 ) Tyler, Texas ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC., 8:58 a.m. ET AL ) July 15, 2013 ****************************************************** WI-LAN, INC. ) DOCKET NO. 6:13cv252 -vs) HTC CORPORATION, ET AL ) 11 12 13 14 15 TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS, UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY 16 17 18 19 COURT REPORTERS: 20 21 MS. SHEA SLOAN MS. JUDY WERLINGER 211 W. Ferguson Tyler, Texas 75702 shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov 22 23 24 25 Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was produced by a Computer. Page 99 1 Just think of a simple example, right? 2 If one of my kids came to me and they just -- I gave 3 them a cookie. 4 Dad, may I have another cookie, or may I have an 5 additional cookie? 6 I said: 7 one you just ate? They eat the cookie, and they said: How do you think they would react if The additional cookie that you can have is the 8 Does that make any sense to you? 9 Additional is more. 10 It's extra. 11 Right? It's additional. the same thing. 12 It's something -- it's another. 13 It's not And what Wi-LAN would have you believe is that you could take one code and call it two things. 14 That's not additional; it's not another; 15 it's not extra; it does not meet structure in the entire 16 purpose of these claims. 17 So now what I'd like to do is, I'd like 18 to explain, starting from the background, why does two 19 matter? Why is it this way? 20 And so let's start with what Airspan was 21 trying to do. 22 system. 23 fixed system, okay? 24 25 They were trying to do a fixed access That's what we see right over here. It's a If we see -- look into the document, we can see right over here, it's for fixed end-users. It's

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?