WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
504
SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re 481 MOTION for New Trial CONCERNING THE NON-INFRINGEMENT OF CERTAIN CLAIMS OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,088,326; 6,222,819; 6,195,327 AND 6,381,211 filed by Ericsson Inc., Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc., Sony Mobile Communications AB, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A -- Trial Tr. July 12 2013 AM, # 2 Exhibit B -- Trial Tr. July 15 2013)(Wynne, Richard)
EXHIBIT B
Page 1
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
2
3
WI-LAN, INC.
)
4
DOCKET NO. 6:10cv521
-vs-
5
6
7
8
9
10
)
Tyler, Texas
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA, INC.,
8:58 a.m.
ET AL
)
July 15, 2013
******************************************************
WI-LAN, INC.
)
DOCKET NO. 6:13cv252
-vs)
HTC CORPORATION,
ET AL
)
11
12
13
14
15
TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONARD DAVIS,
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE, AND A JURY
16
17
18
19
COURT REPORTERS:
20
21
MS. SHEA SLOAN
MS. JUDY WERLINGER
211 W. Ferguson
Tyler, Texas 75702
shea_sloan@txed.uscourts.gov
22
23
24
25
Proceedings taken by Machine Stenotype; transcript was
produced by a Computer.
Page 99
1
Just think of a simple example, right?
2
If one of my kids came to me and they just -- I gave
3
them a cookie.
4
Dad, may I have another cookie, or may I have an
5
additional cookie?
6
I said:
7
one you just ate?
They eat the cookie, and they said:
How do you think they would react if
The additional cookie that you can have is the
8
Does that make any sense to you?
9
Additional is more.
10
It's extra.
11
Right?
It's additional.
the same thing.
12
It's something -- it's another.
13
It's not
And what Wi-LAN would have you believe is
that you could take one code and call it two things.
14
That's not additional; it's not another;
15
it's not extra; it does not meet structure in the entire
16
purpose of these claims.
17
So now what I'd like to do is, I'd like
18
to explain, starting from the background, why does two
19
matter?
Why is it this way?
20
And so let's start with what Airspan was
21
trying to do.
22
system.
23
fixed system, okay?
24
25
They were trying to do a fixed access
That's what we see right over here.
It's a
If we see -- look into the document, we
can see right over here, it's for fixed end-users.
It's
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?