WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al
Filing
519
STIPULATION of Dismissal [JOINT] by Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pai, Ajeet)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
WI-LAN INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 6:10-CV-521-LED
Civil Action No. 6:13-CV-252-LED
CASES CONSOLIDATED FOR TRIAL
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) and Defendants HTC Corporation, HTC America,
Inc., and Exedea, Inc. (collectively “HTC”), have reached and signed a binding term sheet
(“Term Sheet”) that, among other things, resolves the current dispute. In view of the foregoing,
the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request the Court order
as follows:
(1) All claims at issue between Wi-LAN and HTC in this action, including all claims
presented by Wi-LAN and all of HTC’s counterclaims, shall be dismissed with
prejudice, contingent on this Court granting this motion and maintaining
jurisdiction over any and all disputes pertaining to the enforcement of any terms
of the Term Sheet;
(2)
Wi-LAN and HTC each shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees;
(3)
HTC withdraws the following pending motions and/or oppositions:
a. HTC’s Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (13-CV-252, Dkt. 433) and
HTC’s joinder to Defendants’ Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (10CV-521, Dkt. No. 475);
b. HTC’s Agreed Bill of Costs (13-CV-252, Dkt. No. 435);
c. HTC’s joinder to Defendants’ oppositions (10-CV-521, Dkt. Nos. 491,
492) to Wi-LAN’s Motion for a New Trial (13-CV-252, Dkt. No. 436; 10CV-521, Dkt. No. 481) and Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of
Law of No Invalidity (13-CV-525, Dkt. No. 437; 10-CV-521, Dkt. No.
482);
d. HTC’s opposition (10-CV-521, Dkt. No. 495) to Wi-LAN, Ericsson, and
Sony Mobile’s Partially Opposed Joint Motion to Seal Certain Trial
Exhibits;
e. HTC’s joinder to any other pending motions or oppositions filed by
defendants in this action.
(4) The parties stipulate and agree that this Court shall retain and maintain
jurisdiction to enforce any of terms of the Term Sheet referenced above.
Dated: October 1, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Martin R. Bader (with permission)
Eric H. Findlay
Texas State Bar No. 00789886
efindlay@findlaycraft.com
FINDLAY CRAFT LLP
6760 Old Jacksonville Highway, Suite 101
Tyler, Texas 75703
Telephone: (903) 534-1100
Facsimile: (903) 534-1137
By: /s/ Ajeet P. Pai
David B. Weaver (TX Bar No. 00798576)
Lead Attorney
Steve R. Borgman (TX Bar No. 02670300)
Gwendolyn J. Samora (TX Bar No. 00784899)
Avelyn M. Ross (TX Bar No. 24027817)
Ajeet P. Pai (TX Bar No. 24060376)
Syed K. Fareed (TX Bar No. 24065216)
Jeffrey T. Han (TX Bar No. 24069870)
Seth A. Lindner (TX Bar No. 24078862)
2
VINSON &ELKINS LLP
Stephen S. Korniczky
Martin R. Bader
skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com
mbader@sheppardmullin.com
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLC
12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Diego, California 92130
Telephone: (858) 720-8900
Facsimile: (858) 509-3691
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT HTC
CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC.
AND EXEDEA, INC.
2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100
Austin, TX 78746
Tel: (512) 542-8400
Fax: (512) 236-3476
WI-LAN@velaw.com
Local Counsel
Johnny Ward (TX Bar No. 00794818)
Wesley Hill (TX Bar No. 24032294)
Ward & Smith Law Firm
P.O. Box 1231, 1127 Judson Rd., Ste. 220
Longview, TX 75606-1231
Tel: (903) 757-6400
Fax: (903) 757-2323
jw@jwfirm.com
wh@jwfirm.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, WI-LAN
INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed
electronically pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a) and served on all counsel of record via the Court’s
ECF and by electronic means on counsel of record on October 1, 2013.
/s/ Ajeet P. Pai
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?