WI-LAN Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. et al

Filing 519

STIPULATION of Dismissal [JOINT] by Exedea INC., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, WI-LAN Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pai, Ajeet)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION WI-LAN INC., Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 6:10-CV-521-LED Civil Action No. 6:13-CV-252-LED CASES CONSOLIDATED FOR TRIAL STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff Wi-LAN Inc. (“Wi-LAN”) and Defendants HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., and Exedea, Inc. (collectively “HTC”), have reached and signed a binding term sheet (“Term Sheet”) that, among other things, resolves the current dispute. In view of the foregoing, the parties, by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request the Court order as follows: (1) All claims at issue between Wi-LAN and HTC in this action, including all claims presented by Wi-LAN and all of HTC’s counterclaims, shall be dismissed with prejudice, contingent on this Court granting this motion and maintaining jurisdiction over any and all disputes pertaining to the enforcement of any terms of the Term Sheet; (2) Wi-LAN and HTC each shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees; (3) HTC withdraws the following pending motions and/or oppositions: a. HTC’s Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (13-CV-252, Dkt. 433) and HTC’s joinder to Defendants’ Motion to Recover Attorneys’ Fees (10CV-521, Dkt. No. 475); b. HTC’s Agreed Bill of Costs (13-CV-252, Dkt. No. 435); c. HTC’s joinder to Defendants’ oppositions (10-CV-521, Dkt. Nos. 491, 492) to Wi-LAN’s Motion for a New Trial (13-CV-252, Dkt. No. 436; 10CV-521, Dkt. No. 481) and Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of No Invalidity (13-CV-525, Dkt. No. 437; 10-CV-521, Dkt. No. 482); d. HTC’s opposition (10-CV-521, Dkt. No. 495) to Wi-LAN, Ericsson, and Sony Mobile’s Partially Opposed Joint Motion to Seal Certain Trial Exhibits; e. HTC’s joinder to any other pending motions or oppositions filed by defendants in this action. (4) The parties stipulate and agree that this Court shall retain and maintain jurisdiction to enforce any of terms of the Term Sheet referenced above. Dated: October 1, 2013 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Martin R. Bader (with permission) Eric H. Findlay Texas State Bar No. 00789886 efindlay@findlaycraft.com FINDLAY CRAFT LLP 6760 Old Jacksonville Highway, Suite 101 Tyler, Texas 75703 Telephone: (903) 534-1100 Facsimile: (903) 534-1137 By: /s/ Ajeet P. Pai David B. Weaver (TX Bar No. 00798576) Lead Attorney Steve R. Borgman (TX Bar No. 02670300) Gwendolyn J. Samora (TX Bar No. 00784899) Avelyn M. Ross (TX Bar No. 24027817) Ajeet P. Pai (TX Bar No. 24060376) Syed K. Fareed (TX Bar No. 24065216) Jeffrey T. Han (TX Bar No. 24069870) Seth A. Lindner (TX Bar No. 24078862) 2 VINSON &ELKINS LLP Stephen S. Korniczky Martin R. Bader skorniczky@sheppardmullin.com mbader@sheppardmullin.com SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLC 12275 El Camino Real, Suite 200 San Diego, California 92130 Telephone: (858) 720-8900 Facsimile: (858) 509-3691 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC. AND EXEDEA, INC. 2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78746 Tel: (512) 542-8400 Fax: (512) 236-3476 WI-LAN@velaw.com Local Counsel Johnny Ward (TX Bar No. 00794818) Wesley Hill (TX Bar No. 24032294) Ward & Smith Law Firm P.O. Box 1231, 1127 Judson Rd., Ste. 220 Longview, TX 75606-1231 Tel: (903) 757-6400 Fax: (903) 757-2323 jw@jwfirm.com wh@jwfirm.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, WI-LAN INC. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was filed electronically pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a) and served on all counsel of record via the Court’s ECF and by electronic means on counsel of record on October 1, 2013. /s/ Ajeet P. Pai 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?