Gohmert et al v. Pence
Filing
1
COMPLAINT EMERGENCY COMPLAINT FOR EXPEDITED DECLARATORY AND EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Michael R. Pence ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0540-8169550.), filed by Louie Gohmert. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit EX A Arizona Joint Resolution, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sessions, William)
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 29
,l .JOJNT RESOLUTION OF THE 54m LEGISLATURE,
STATE OF ARIZONA
1'0
THE 116111 CONGRESS, OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, PRESIDING.
WHEREAS, it is the constitutional and legal obligation of the Legislature of the State of Arizona
to ensure that the state's presidential electors truly represent the will of the voters of Arizona; mill
WHEREAS, pursuant to the direction of Congress as set forth in United States Code, title 3, section
I as authorized by Article II, section 1, clause 4 of the Constitution of the United States, and state
law adopted pursuant thereto, Arizona conducted an election for presidential electors on the
Tuesday next after the first Monday in November of 2020- that is, 011 November 3, 2020; and
WHEREAS, that election was marred by irregularities so significant as to render it highly doubtfuJ
whether the certified results accurately represent the will of the voters: nnd
WHEREAS, Congress has further directed in U.S. Code, title 3, section 2 that when a state "has
held a11 election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day
prescribed by law, the electors may he appointed on a subsequent day in such manner as the
legislature of such State may direct"; and
EXHIBIT A
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 30
WHEREAS that provi ion implicitly recognizes that Article II, Section 1 Clau. e 2 of the U .S.
Constitution grant. to each tale legislature, with tated limitations, the sole authority to prescribe
the manner of appointing elector for that state; and
WHEREAS the United tates Supreme Court and other courts have explained that when a . tate
legi lature direct. the manner of appointing electors, it doCj
o pursuant to a grant of authority
from the U.S . Constitution rather than by reason of any slate constitutional or other legal provision;
that thi. authority may be exercised by the Jegi lature alone without other a pect. of the normal
lawmaking proce ; and that the tate legi lature . authority over the appointment of pre idential
electors L plenary and may be resumed at any time; and
WHEREAS becau e U.S. Code, title 3 . ection 7 mandate. that all pre. idential elector vote for
President and Vice Pre ident of the United States on December 14, 2020, it i impo sible to pursue
the Legislature
preferred course of action, which wou ld b for Arizona'
oter to participate in
a new and fair and free pre. idential election before that date; and
WHEREAS in view of the fact heretofore recited , the Legislature is required to exer i e its best
judgment a to which . late of electors the voters prefer and
WHEREAS legal precedent exi t. where in 1960 the State of Hawaii ent an alternate late of
electors while the Presidential election wa
till in que tion in order to meet the deadline of
. electing elector and upon recount the alternate . late of elector.' ballots were ultimalely counted:
and
WHEREAS , the undersigned ha e an obligation to find the tru h .
occasion
ince
or thi rea. on on everal
ovember 3, we tate lawmakers ha e requested fact-finding hearing to in lude
a comprehen ive and independent foren. ic audit. At th.is time, no such audiL has been aulhorized.
This leave the uncertainty of the elec ion r~ ult in a tale that require further invesl'igation and
re. olution; and
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 31
WH R
th
enat Judi iary landing
mmitte today ailed for a for n. i audit of ariou
I ction irregularitie , ngoing litigation L urrently activ , and ther ar unres I d disput
n Presid -n ial ampaign, r nd ring th
b h th
dal
by
igning
8 ° it r . ol ed by th und r ign d L gi I· tors. memb
t'.
that th alt -route l 1 le t ral vote be a c pted f r c
t
nate, requ . t
rump or t hav all el ctoral
nduct d. B it furth r r
nit -d tat
L gislarur d - m th
rizona Hou. and
naJd l
nullifi. d
the
fthe
on. ider a ~ lat
le tlon to be final and all irr gulariti
lved th
tat of Ari.zona ntil th
r s Iv d
igned thi~ day • 14 0 - emb r, 2020.
.
-
,t
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 1-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 32
"''
R pre ntali ve Travis
egi lati
R pr
ntaliv
istrict 12
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?