Gohmert et al v. Pence
Filing
20
MOTION to Dismiss by Timothy P Dowling. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order to intervene, # 2 Text of Proposed Order Order to dismiss)(Dowling, Timothy)
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 20-1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 216
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TYLER DIVISION
Louie Gohmert, Tyler Bowyer,
Nancy Cottle, Jake Hoffman,
Anthony Kern, James R. Lamon,
James Moorhead, Robert Montgomery,
Loraine Pellegrino, Greg Safsten,
Kelli Ward and Michael Ward
Plaintiffs
v.
Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00660
(Election Matter)
The Honorable Michael R. Pence, Vice
President of the United States,
in his official capacity,
Defendant
Order Granting the Emergency Opposed Motion of Timothy P. Dowling
to Intervene
1
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 20-1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 217
Came on properly for consideration on ___________, 202__ the
Emergency Opposed Motion of Timothy P. Dowling (“Dowling”) to
Intervene (“Motion”). Upon consideration of the Motion, any response
filed to the Motion, and all other relevant matters, the Court hereby finds
that Dowling is entitled to intervene in this case as a matter of right
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), but even if that was
not the case, the Court further finds that Dowling should be permitted to
permissively intervene in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 24(b). Accordingly Dowling is a party in this case and he
shall be served by email sent to Relampago@aol.com, and he shall be
entitled to participate in all hearings in this case (including being
authorized to participate remotely by telephone or video conference call
if the Court holds any hearings using either or both of those means of
communication).
SO ORDERED.
2
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 20-1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 218
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?