Gohmert et al v. Pence
MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Brief by U.S. House of Representatives. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Letter, Douglas)
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 21 Filed 12/31/20 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 221
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LOUIE GOHMERT, et al.,
Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-00660-JDK
THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. PENCE,
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES, in his official capacity,
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF
OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DISMISSAL
The U.S. House of Representatives respectfully moves for leave to file the accompanying
amicus curiae brief in support of dismissal.1 Plaintiffs take no position and Defendant consents
to the filing of this brief. No person or entity other than amicus and its counsel assisted in or
made a monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of this brief.
The decision to allow the filing of an amicus curiae brief “lies solely within the
court’s discretion.” U.S. ex rel. Gudur v. Deloitte Consulting LLP, 512 F. Supp. 2d 920, 927
(S.D. Tex. 2007). Among other factors, a court may consider whether “the proffered information
The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) of the U.S. House of Representatives,
which “speaks for, and articulates the institutional position of, the House in all litigation
matters,” has authorized the filing of an amicus brief in this matter. Rules of the U.S. House of
Representatives (116th Cong.), Rule II.8(b), https://perma.cc/M25F-496H. The BLAG
comprises the Honorable Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, the Honorable Steny H. Hoyer,
Majority Leader, the Honorable James E. Clyburn, Majority Whip, the Honorable Kevin
McCarthy, Republican Leader, and the Honorable Steve Scalise, Republican Whip.
Representative McCarthy and Representative Scalise dissented.
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 21 Filed 12/31/20 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 222
is ‘timely and useful’ or otherwise necessary to the administration of justice.” United States v.
Olis, No. CIV.A. H-07-3295, 2008 WL 620520, at *7 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 3, 2008).
The House’s motion for leave to file an amicus brief should be granted. The House has a
significant institutional interest in this litigation, which seeks to upend Congress’s longstanding
role in counting the votes of the Electoral College in Presidential elections by invalidating the
federal statute—the Electoral Count Act—that has governed that process since its 1887
Pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, following each Presidential election, each state’s
electors meet in their respective states, certify lists of all electors who voted for President and
Vice President, and transmit their list to the President of the Senate. After that process, “[t]he
President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open
all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted.” U.S. Const. amend. XII. The House has
a compelling interest in how the constitutionally mandated Joint Session of Congress proceeds
on January 6, 2021.
As the proposed amicus brief explains, the Electoral Count Act codified Congress’s
practice, pursuant to the Twelfth Amendment, of counting and resolving disputes over electoral
votes. The House has important interests in preserving Congress’s power to adopt procedures
governing the counting of electoral votes, and in ensuring that the orderly procedures that have
governed the Joint Session since the Presidential election of 1888 continue to do so.
The House also has a compelling interest in ensuring that the public’s confidence in the
processes for confirming the results of the 2020 Presidential election is not undermined by this
last-minute suit, which would authorize the Vice President to ignore the will of the Nation’s
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 21 Filed 12/31/20 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 223
voters and choose the winner in an election in which he himself is a candidate, as will often be
Finally, the House has expertise in the Twelfth Amendment’s procedures for counting
electoral votes, which it has implemented for every election since that amendment was ratified in
1804. The House submits that its brief will aid the Court in considering plaintiffs’ claims and
provides a perspective that otherwise would not be available to the Court. Numerous federal
courts throughout the country (including the U.S. Supreme Court) have in recent years granted
leave for amicus briefs by the House.
Given the unique procedural posture of this filing, the page limits governing this filing
are unclear. We therefore respectfully request that the Court accept the brief at its current length
of 23 pages.
For the foregoing reasons, the House’s motion for leave to file the proposed amicus brief
should be granted.
Caitlin Halligan (NY Bar No. 3933447)
Samuel Breidbart (NY Bar No. 5783352)
Adam K. Hersh (NY Bar No. 5693064)
Max H. Siegel (NY Bar No. 5652235)
SELENDY & GAY PLLC
1290 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10104
Michael R. Dreeben (DC Bar No. 370586)
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW
600 New Jersey Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
/s/ Douglas N. Letter
Douglas N. Letter (DC Bar No. 253492)
Todd B. Tatelman (VA Bar No. 66008)
Megan Barbero (MA Bar No. 668854)
Josephine Morse (DC Bar No. 1531317)
William E. Havemann (VA Bar No. 86961)
Eric R. Columbus (DC Bar No. 487736)
Lisa K. Helvin (DC Bar No. 988143)
Jonathan B. Schwartz (DC Bar No. 342758)
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
219 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Telephone: (202) 225-9700
Facsimile: (202) 226-1360
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 21 Filed 12/31/20 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 224
December 31, 2020
Counsel for Amicus U.S. House of Representatives *
Attorneys for the Office of General Counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives,
including any counsel specially retained by the Office of General Counsel, are “entitled, for the
purpose of performing the counsel’s functions, to enter an appearance in any proceeding before
any court of the United States or of any State or political subdivision thereof without compliance
with any requirements for admission to practice before such court.” 2 U.S.C. § 5571(a).
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 21 Filed 12/31/20 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 225
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I hereby certify that as counsel for amicus curiae, the United States House of
Representatives, I have complied with the meet and confer requirement in Local Rule CV-7(h) in
the following respects: On December 30 and 31, 2020, I have personally contacted attorneys at
the Department of Justice, who have informed me that they are representing Defendant Vice
President Michael R. Pence. I spoke by telephone and exchanged several emails regarding the
House’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Brief of the U.S. House of Representatives as
Amicus Curiae in Support of Dismissal with John Griffiths, the Director of the Department of
Justice Civil Division Federal Programs Branch. I have also exchanged emails on the same
subject with Jeff Clark, Acting Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Division, copying John
Coghlan, Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Federal Programs Branch, and I spoke by
telephone with Mr. Coghlan. Mr. Clark expressly represented that Defendant consents to the
House’s motion for leave to file a brief in the case as amicus curiae.
In addition, on December 31, 2020, I spoke by telephone with William Sessions, counsel
for plaintiffs, and we discussed the House’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Brief of the
U.S. House of Representatives as Amicus Curiae in Support of Dismissal. I have also exchanged
emails with Mr. Sessions and the other attorneys representing plaintiffs. Mr. Sessions
represented that Plaintiffs take no position on the House’s motion.
December 31, 2020
/s/ Douglas N. Letter
Douglas N. Letter
Case 6:20-cv-00660-JDK Document 21 Filed 12/31/20 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 226
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on December 31, 2020, I caused the foregoing document to be filed via the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas CM/ECF system, which I
understand caused a copy to be served on all registered parties.
/s/ Douglas N. Letter
Douglas N. Letter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?