Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Filing 211

Joint MOTION Defendants' Objections and Motion to Preclude Testimony by Mark Baldwin and Memorandum In Support by Microsoft Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Marla Beier# 2 Exhibit 1# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3# 5 Exhibit 4# 6 Exhibit 5)(Vandenberg, John)

Download PDF
Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al Doc. 211 Att. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ANASCAPE, LTD. Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Hon. Ron Clark Civil Action No. 9:06-CV-00158-RC DECLARATION OF MARLA BEIER I, Marla Beier, declare that: 1. I am over 18 years of age and make this declaration based on my own knowledge, personal experience and belief; and I am competent to make this declaration. 2. I am a legal assistant for the firm of Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, co-counsel for Microsoft Corporation in this action. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the February 11, 2008 expert report of Mark Baldwin, entitled "Viability and Value of Game Controller Features." 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an advertising flyer published in 1993 for the Logitech "CyberMan 3D Controller." 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of PCT Publication No. WO 93/18475, with a publication date of September 16, 1993, entitled "Six Degrees Of Freedom Controller With Tactile Feedback." 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the claims of US Patent No. 6,906,700, dated June 15, 2005, entitled "3d Controller With Vibration." 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the prosecution history of U.S. Patent Application No. 09/715,532, which issued as U.S. Patent No. 6,906,700. DECLARATION OF MARLA BEIER Page 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?