Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Filing 356

MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Renewed), or in the Alternative, MOTION for New Trial filed by Nintendo of America, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goehringer, Charles)

Anascape, Ltd v. Microsoft Corp. et al

Doc. 356 Att. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION ANASCAPE, LTD. Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § §

Hon. Ron Clark

Civil Action No. 9:06-CV-00158-RC

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.'S RULE 50 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Upon consideration of motion of Nintendo of America Inc. ("Nintendo") for judgment as a matter of law, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED: (1) Nintendo's GameCube controller does not infringe the asserted claims of the `700 patent; (2) Nintendo's Wavebird wireless controller does not infringe the asserted claims of the `700 patent; (3) Nintendo's Wii Classic controller connected to the Wii Remote controller does not infringe the asserted claims of the `700 patent; (5) The effective filing date of the asserted claims of the `700 patent is November 16, 2000; (6) Each of the asserted claims of the `700 patent is either anticipated or rendered obvious by the prior art; (7) None of the asserted claims of the `700 patent satisfies the written description requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112; and

US1DOCS 6735371v1

Dockets.Justia.com

(8) Plaintiff Anascape is not entitled to collect damages from Nintendo.

US1DOCS 6735371v1

US1DOCS 6735371v1