Weinberg v. National Football League Players Association et al

Filing 38

MOTION / Request for Oral Argument re 13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition, 20 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Richard Berthelsen, Gene Upshaw, Tom DePaso, Trace Armstrong, John Collins, Keith Washington, Mark Levin, National Football League Players Association (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Miller, Ralph)

Download PDF
Weinberg v. National Football League Players Association et al Doc. 38 Att. 1 Case 3:06-cv-02332 Document 38-2 Filed 04/13/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION Steve Weinberg, Plaintiff, vs. National Football League Players Association, Richard Berthelsen, Gene Upshaw, Tom DePaso, Trace Armstrong, Roger Kaplan, John Collins, Keith Washington, Tony Agnone, Howard Shatsky, and Mark Levin, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 3-06-CV2332-B ECF [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE NFLPA DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Defendants National Football League Players Association, Richard Berthelsen, Tom DePaso, Gene Upshaw, Mark Levin, Trace Armstrong, John Collins, and Keith Washington (collectively "NFLPA Defendants") to request oral argument on the issues related to the NFLPA Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss the Petition and on the issues related to Plaintiff Steve Weinberg's Motion to Remand to State Court; IT IS on this _____ day of April, 2007 ORDERED that: The NFLPA Defendants' request for oral argument is GRANTED. ____________________________ Honorable Jane Boyle United States District Court Northern District of Texas ORDER GRANTING THE NFLPA DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT [PROPOSED] DA1:\480900\01\@B2C01!.DOC\64922.0232 SOLO PAGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?