Harris v. Blockbuster Inc

Filing 41

Plaintiffs' MOTION to Lift Stay, Consolidate Proceedings and MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Cathryn Elaine Harris, Mario Herrera, Maryam Hosseiny with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8) (Wilson, Jeremy)

Download PDF
Case5:08-cv-03845-RS Document22 Filed01/22/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Shawn Hanson (State Bar No. 109321) shanson@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 Attorneys for Defendant HOTWIRE, INC. [Counsel for Defendants Continued on Signature Page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION SEAN LANE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. C 08-03845 RS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PROCEEDING BEFORE JUDGE SEEBORG AND REMOVING MOTION TO DISMISS FROM COURT CALENDAR Judge: Richard Seeborg Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: 1. Further to the call with the Court on December 17, 2008, all parties stipulate that they consent to proceeding before United States Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg in the abovecaptioned proceedings for all purposes. 2. Moving party Facebook, Inc. requests that the Court take off calendar the pending motion to dismiss the complaint, filed October 10, 2008, and schedule a status conference for early March 2009. JOINT STIP. & PROP. ORD. RE PROCEEDING BEFORE JUDGE SEEBORG & REMOVING MTN. TO DIS. FROM CALENDAR, C 08-03845 RS Case5:08-cv-03845-RS Document22 Filed01/22/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 22, 2009 KAMBEREDELSON LLC By: /s/ Scott A. Kamber Alan Himmelfarb Scott A. Kamber (pro hac vice to be submitted) Attorneys for Plaintiffs DATED: January 22, 2009 COOLEY GODWARD KRONISH LLP By: /s/ Michael G. Rhodes Michael G. Rhodes Attorneys for Facebook, Inc. DATED: January 22, 2009 JONES DAY By: /s/ Shawn Hanson Shawn Hanson Attorneys for Defendant Hotwire, Inc. DATED: January 9, 2009 VINSON & ELKINS LLP By: /s/ Marc A. Fuller Marc A. Fuller Attorneys for Defendant Blockbuster, Inc. DATED: January 22, 2009 ZAPPOS.COM, INC. By: /s/ Donna M. Herzing Donna M. Herzing Attorneys for Defendant Zappos.com, Inc. DATED: January 20, 2009 OVERSTOCK.COM, INC. By: /s/ Jonathan E. Johnson III Jonathan E. Johnson III Attorneys for Defendant Overstock.com, Inc. -2- JOINT STIP. & PROP. ORD. RE PROCEEDING BEFORE JUDGE SEEBORG & REMOVING MTN. TO DIS. FROM CALENDAR, C 08-03845 RS Case5:08-cv-03845-RS Document22 Filed01/22/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: January 12, 2009 FANDANGO, INC. By: /s/ Stacey Olliff Stacey Olliff Attorneys for Defendant Fandango, Inc. DATED: January 20, 2009 HAYES DAVIS BONINO ELLINGSON MCLAY & SCOTT, LLP By: /s/ Stephen P. Ellingson Stephen P. Ellingson Attorneys for Defendant STA Travel, Inc. DATED: January 20, 2009 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP By: /s/ Kent R. Raygor Kent R. Raygor Attorneys for Defendant Gamefly, Inc. ATTESTATION CERTIFICATE I, Shawn Hanson, hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this efiled document. DATED: January 22, 2009 JONES DAY By: /s/ Shawn Hanson Shawn Hanson Attorneys for Defendant Hotwire, Inc. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _______________________, 2009 ______________________________ The Honorable Richard Seeborg Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court SFI-601780v1 -3- JOINT STIP. & PROP. ORD. RE PROCEEDING BEFORE JUDGE SEEBORG & REMOVING MTN. TO DIS. FROM CALENDAR, C 08-03845 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?