American Airlines Inc v. Travelport Limited et al

Filing 145

Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order / Motion for Entry of a Stipulated Supplemental Protective Order filed by American Airlines Inc (Attachments: #1 Stipulated Supplemental Protective Order) (Hartmann, Michelle)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH DIVISION
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
SABRE, INC., ET AL.
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:11-CV-244-Y
§
§
§
§

STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
Plaintiff American Airlines, Inc. (“American”), and non-party Concur
Technologies, Inc. (“Concur”), upon which American has issued a Subpoena to Produce
Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action dated
July 5, 2011 (“the Subpoena”), hereby agree and stipulate that Concur’s production of
documents and information in response to the Subpoena and any additional discovery requests
that may be served by American upon Concur in this matter (“Concur Discovery Material”) shall
be governed by the protective order entered on August 15, 2011 (Dkt. 130) (“the Protective
Order”).
In addition to the protections and provisions set forth in this Protective Order,
which is wholly incorporated herein by reference, American and Concur stipulate as follows: (1)
Concur Discovery Material designated as “Confidential-Outside Counsel’s Eyes Only” or
“Highly Confidential” will be construed as equivalent to “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only
Information” pursuant to paragraphs 6, 11, 12(a)-(e), 13 and 14 of the Protective Order; and (2)
Concur Discovery Material produced in response to the Subpoena Duces Tecum issued by
American in American Airlines, Inc. v. Sabre, Inc. et al., 67th Judicial District Court, Tarrant
County, Texas, No. 067-249214-10 (“the State Proceeding”) under the terms of the protective
orders entered in the State Proceeding on January 24, 2011 and August 8, 2011, may also be used
US_ACTIVE:\43817137\01\14013.0135

in this proceeding.
Unless this order includes a clause that explicitly states that a particular local
civil rule is modified as applied to this case, nothing in this order shall be construed to
modify the provisions, operation, or effect of any local civil rule of this Court.
SIGNED: October ___, 2011

HONORABLE TERRY R. MEANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

US_ACTIVE:\43817137\01\14013.0135

2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Michelle Hartmann
Michelle Hartmann
State Bar No. 24032401
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
200 Crescent Court, Suite 300
Dallas, Texas 75201-6950
214.746.7700
214.746.7777 (fax)

/s/ Jennifer J. Johnson
Jennifer J. Johnson (CSB No. 252897)
Rodger R. Cole (CSB No. 178865)
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, Floor 12
San Francisco, California 94104
415.875.2300
415.281.1350 (fax)

Richard A. Rothman
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10153
212.310.8426
212.310.8285 (fax)

ATTORNEYS FOR NON-PARTY
CONCUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Bill F. Bogle
State Bar No. 02561000
Roland K. Johnson
State Bar No. 00000084
HARRIS, FINLEY & BOGLE, P.C.
777 Main Street, Suite 3600
Fort Worth, Texas 76102
817.870.8700
817.332.6121 (fax)
R. Paul Yetter
State Bar No. 22154200
Anna Rotman
State Bar No. 24046761
YETTER COLEMAN LLP
909 Fannin, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas 77010
713.632.8000
713.632.8002 (fax)
M.J. Moltenbrey
DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP
1101 New York Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20005
202.346.8738
202.346.8102 (fax)
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
US_ACTIVE:\43817137\01\14013.0135

3