American Airlines Inc v. Travelport Limited et al

Filing 221

MOTION Request for Rule 16 Status Conference filed by American Airlines Inc (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exh. A, #2 Exhibit(s) Exh. B, #3 Exhibit(s) Exh. C) (Rotman, Anna)

Download PDF
  January 26, 2012 Via Email Michael Weiner Carolyn Feeney Dechert LLP Steven Kaiser Cleary Gottleib Steen & Hamilton LLP Chris Lind Sundeep K . (Rob) Addy Barlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP Christopher S. Yates Brendan McShane Latham & Watkins LLP Re: American Airlines, Inc. v. Travelport Ltd., et al., No. 4:11-CV-244-Y (N.D. Tex.) Dear Counsel: Defendants had agreed to jointly request a status conference after briefing is completed on certain motions. (Exh. A) Travelport now is questioning the reason for the status conference. As we explained earlier, our goal is to ensure that the pending motions regarding the sufficiency of American’s pleadings are resolved efficiently, particularly in light of the Scheduling Order. Specifically, we seek the Court’s guidance on two issues. First, the Court granted American’s motion to file the Second Amended Complaint with respect to all but the Section 1 claim challenging vertical agreements between the GDSs and travel agents. That amendment did not address certain omissions identified in the Court’s opinion that American can cure. Orbitz refused to agree to American’s request to add these factual allegations and now Travelport and Sabre have opposed American’s motion for reconsideration seeking leave to re-plead based on their omission. It will waste the Court’s time to decide the motions before American includes these new allegations, which American has already provided in its proposed Third Amended Complaint. At the status conference, American will draw this to the Court’s attention to ensure these pending motions are decided efficiently. Second, American moved to extend scheduling order deadlines. Certain deadlines, including document production and amendment of pleadings, will pass in the coming weeks. Meanwhile, the motions to dismiss are still being briefed, Travelport recently filed counterclaims, Sabre has threatened to file counterclaims, and much discovery remains. In addition, American’s chapter 11 bankruptcy case requires its focused efforts. American will seek the Court’s guidance on the schedule, so that the parties can plan accordingly.   Exhibit B   Counsel for Defendants -2- January 26, 2012       American believes the parties and Court will benefit from clarity on these two issues. If defendants have other issues on which they will seek guidance, let us know promptly. And please confirm that defendants will honor their agreement to jointly request a status conference with the Court. Cordially yours, _______________________ R. Paul Yetter cc: Richard A. Rothman Yolanda C. Garcia Weil, Gothsal & Manges LLP Bill K. Bogle Roland F. Johnson Harris, Finley & Bogle, P.C.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?