Texas et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 39

PLAINTIFF-STATES' AND INDIVIDUAL-PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Neill Hurley, Indiana, Kansas, Paul LePage, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, John Nantz, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virgina, Wisconsin (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Application for Preliminary Injunction)Attorney Darren L McCarty added to party Neill Hurley(pty:pla), Attorney Darren L McCarty added to party John Nantz(pty:pla) (McCarty, Darren) Modified title on 4/26/2018 (ctf).

Download PDF
No. 4:18-cv-00167-O In the United States District Court FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXAS, WISCONSIN, ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, ARIZONA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, INDIANA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, PAUL LEPAGE, Governor of Maine, GOVERNOR PHIL BRYANT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NORTH DAKOTA, SOUTH CAROLINA, TENNESSEE, UTAH, WEST VIRGINIA, NEILL HURLEY, and JOHN NANTZ, PLAINTIFFS, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX AZAR, in his Official Capacity as SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, and DAVID J. KAUTTER, in his Official Capacity as Acting COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, DEFENDANTS. [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION The Court, having considered Plaintiff-States’ and Individual-Plaintiffs’ Application for Preliminary Injunction and all briefing submitted in support of and in opposition to the application, as well as the applicable law, concludes that the application has merit and should be, and hereby is, GRANTED. Defendants are hereby ENJOINED from enforcing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its associated regulations. SIGNED on this __ day of , 2018. THE HONORABLE REED O’CONNOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?