Castro v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
Filing
32
Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation by Entrepreneur Media, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Barber, William)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
DANIEL R. CASTRO,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC.,
Defendant.
Civil Action No. A 10 CA 695 LY
DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE REPLY IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT
Defendant Entrepreneur Media, Inc., moves for leave to file its Reply in Support of
Partial Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6) (“Reply”), which is in
excess of the 5-page limitation set forth in the Local Rule CV-7(e). Defendant requires a
moderate number of additional pages to address the issues raised in Plaintiff’s multiple responses
to the Motion. Specifically, Defendant requests a total of 15 pages for its Reply.
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
Prior to filing this motion, counsel for Defendant conferred by email with Plaintiff
concerning this motion. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion.
1
Respectfully submitted,
Dated:
January 18, 2011
By: /s/ William G. Barber
William G. Barber
Texas Bar No. 01713050
PIRKEY BARBER LLP
600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120
Austin, Texas 78701
Tel: (512) 322-5200
Fax: (512) 322-5201
Perry J. Viscounty
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Jennifer L. Barry
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Latham & Watkins LLP
650 Town Center Drive
20th Floor
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: (714) 540-1235
Fax: (714) 755-8290
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify the on the 18th of January, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with
the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the
following:
Daniel R. Castro
CASTRO & BAKER, LLP
7800 Shoal Creek Blvd.
Suite 100N
Austin, TX 78757
/s/ William G. Barber
William G. Barber
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?