Castro v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.

Filing 32

Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation by Entrepreneur Media, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Barber, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION DANIEL R. CASTRO, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. A 10 CA 695 LY DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY IN EXCESS OF PAGE LIMIT Defendant Entrepreneur Media, Inc., moves for leave to file its Reply in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6) (“Reply”), which is in excess of the 5-page limitation set forth in the Local Rule CV-7(e). Defendant requires a moderate number of additional pages to address the issues raised in Plaintiff’s multiple responses to the Motion. Specifically, Defendant requests a total of 15 pages for its Reply. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Prior to filing this motion, counsel for Defendant conferred by email with Plaintiff concerning this motion. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. 1 Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 18, 2011 By: /s/ William G. Barber William G. Barber Texas Bar No. 01713050 PIRKEY BARBER LLP 600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120 Austin, Texas 78701 Tel: (512) 322-5200 Fax: (512) 322-5201 Perry J. Viscounty Admitted Pro Hac Vice Jennifer L. Barry Admitted Pro Hac Vice Latham & Watkins LLP 650 Town Center Drive 20th Floor Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tel: (714) 540-1235 Fax: (714) 755-8290 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify the on the 18th of January, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Daniel R. Castro CASTRO & BAKER, LLP 7800 Shoal Creek Blvd. Suite 100N Austin, TX 78757 /s/ William G. Barber William G. Barber 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?