Castro v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.

Filing 54

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Entrepreneur Media, Inc., re 45 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(1) For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Daniel R. Castro, 43 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss Based On Rule 12(b)(6) For Failure to State a Claim filed by Plaintiff Daniel R. Castro (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Barber, William)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION DANIEL R. CASTRO, Plaintiff, v. ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., Defendant. ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC., Counterclaimant, v. DANIEL R. CASTRO, Counterdefendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Cause No. 1-10-CV-000695-LY Hon. Lee Yeakel ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RULE 12(b)(6) AND 12(b)(1) MOTIONS TO DISMISS Upon consideration of Plaintiff Daniel R. Castro’s (“Castro”) Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss EMI’s Declaratory Judgment Act Claims, and Defendant Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s (“EMI”) Combined Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Castro’s Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(b)(1) Motions should be, and are hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honorable Lee Yeakel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?