Castro v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.

Filing 54

Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Entrepreneur Media, Inc., re 45 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(1) For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Daniel R. Castro, 43 Opposed MOTION to Dismiss Based On Rule 12(b)(6) For Failure to State a Claim filed by Plaintiff Daniel R. Castro (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Barber, William)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AUSTIN DIVISION
DANIEL R. CASTRO,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC.,
Defendant.

ENTREPRENEUR MEDIA, INC.,
Counterclaimant,
v.
DANIEL R. CASTRO,
Counterdefendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Cause No. 1-10-CV-000695-LY
Hon. Lee Yeakel

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
RULE 12(b)(6) AND 12(b)(1) MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Upon consideration of Plaintiff Daniel R. Castro’s (“Castro”) Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to
Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss EMI’s Declaratory
Judgment Act Claims, and Defendant Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s (“EMI”) Combined Opposition
thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Castro’s Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(b)(1) Motions
should be, and are hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

Honorable Lee Yeakel